AD 99-18-20 SUPERSEDED

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50, -80A1/A3, and -80C2A series turbofan engines installed on Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes, that requires initial and repetitive thrust reverser inspections and checks, and allows extended repetitive inspection intervals if an optional double p-seal configuration is installed. This amendment is prompted by the report of a higher than anticipated center drive unit (CDU) cone brake failure rate which reduces the overall thrust reverser system protection against inadvertent deployment. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent inadvertent in-flight thrust reverser deployment, which can result in loss of control of the airplane.

Final rule.

99-18-20 GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY: Amendment 39-11286. Docket 98-ANE-54-AD. Issued August 26, 1999.
Applicability: General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50, -80A1/A3, and -80C2A series turbofan engines, installed on Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes.

NOTE 1: This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to each engine identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent inadvertent in-flight thrust reverser deployment, which can result in loss of control of the airplane, accomplish the following:

(a) Perform initial and repetitive thrust reverser inspections and checks as follows:

(1) For GE CF6-50 series engines, perform inspections and checks in accordance with paragraph 2, Accomplishment Instructions, of Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-50 Service Bulletin (SB) No. 78-3001, Revision 2, dated December 18, 1997, as follows:

(i) Perform the initial inspections and checks within 1,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD.

(ii) Thereafter, perform inspections and checks at intervals not to exceed 6,000 hours TIS since last check.

(2) For CF6-80A1/A3 series engines, perform inspections and checks in accordance with paragraph 2, Accomplishment Instructions, of Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80A1/A3 SB No. 78-1002, Revision 3, dated January 21, 1999, as follows:

(i) Perform the initial inspections and checks within 1,500 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD.
(ii) Thereafter, perform inspections and checks at intervals not to exceed 7,000 hours TIS since last check.

(3) For CF6-80C2A series engines, perform inspections and checks in accordance with paragraph 2, Accomplishment Instructions, of Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80C2 Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 78A1015, Revision 5, dated January 21, 1999, as follows:

(i) Perform the initial inspections and checks within 600 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD.

(ii) Thereafter, perform repetitive inspections and checks as follows:

(A) For engines with a double p-seal configuration, having translating cowl part numbers 491B1613000-109 or D52B1000-9, perform repetitive inspections and checks at intervals not to exceed 7,000 hours TIS since last inspection.(B) For all other engines, perform repetitive inspections and checks at intervals not to exceed 600 hours TIS since last inspection.

(4) Perform corrective actions or deactivate the fan reverser in accordance with paragraph 2, Accomplishment Instructions, of the applicable SB or ASB prior to further flight.

(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office. Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Engine Certification Office.

NOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the Engine Certification Office.

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(d) The actions required by this AD shall be done in accordance with the following Middle River Aircraft Systems service documents:

Document No
Pages
Revision
Date
CF6-50 SB 78-3001
1-43
2
December 18, 1997
Total Pages: 43.

CF6-80A1/A3 SB
78-1002
1-31
3
January 21, 1999
Total Pages: 31.

CF6-80C2 ASB
78A1015
1-32
5
January 21, 1999
Total Pages: 32.

This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Middle River Aircraft Systems, Mail Point 46, 103 Chesapeake Park Plaza, Baltimore, MD, 21220-4295, attn: Warranty Support, telephone: (410) 682-0094, fax: (410) 682-0100. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.

(e) This amendment becomes effective on November 2, 1999.

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to General Electric Company (GE) CF6-50, -80A1/A3, and -80C2A series turbofan engines installed on Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1999 (64 FR 8762). That action proposed to require initial and repetitive thrust reverser inspections and checks, and allow extended repetitive inspection intervals if an optional double p-seal configuration is installed.

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the comments received.

One commenter requests an initial inspection interval of at least 860 hours time-in-service (TIS). The commenter states that it performs B-checks at intervals of 430 hours TIS and opens the fan reverser at every other B-check (at intervals of860 hours TIS) for engine accessibility. The FAA does not concur. The thrust reverser system safety analysis indicates that extending the initial compliance interval would increase the probability of an inadvertent deployment of the thrust reverser in-flight and provide an unacceptable level of safety. The FAA determined the need to establish system integrity in the fleet, and the 600 hour TIS initial compliance interval for CF6-80C2A series engines provides that level of safety. The desire to conform inspections to an operator's scheduled maintenance, by itself, is not sufficient to change the initial inspection interval.

One commenter requests inspections performed in accordance with Revision 1 of Middle River Aircraft Systems CF6-80A1/A3 Service Bulletin (SB) No. 78-1002 be accepted for compliance with the proposed rule. The FAA does not concur. Revision 3 of SB No. 78-1002 includes inspections of electrical cables, the aft frame, and the ball screw housing that are not included in earlier revisions.

One commenter states that airplanes that have not had components removed, replaced, or modified which could alter the actuation system rigging, or that have undergone previous health check inspections, should not be required to have the fan reverser operational check portion of the initial inspection performed. The FAA does not concur. The purpose of a fan reverser operational check is to ensure that the system has been restored to operational status after inspections have been completed.

One commenter requests that the reporting requirement, contained in the Accomplishment Instructions of the SB, should be omitted from the proposed rule. The FAA does not concur. The instruction to report inspection results is to the manufacturer, not the FAA. The FAA did not impose a specific reporting requirement in the proposed rule. However, the FAA recommends reporting inspection results to the manufacturer in accordance with the SB, as reporting inspection results is important to ensure that the failure rate data used in the risk analysis to establish inspection requirements and intervals remain valid.

One commenter believes it is not necessary to start the engine to perform the operational check. The FAA concurs. Connection of an external pneumatic power source to the airplane ground connection, or auxiliary power unit (APU), in accordance with the applicable aircraft maintenance manual, is allowed for fan reverser operational checks.
One commenter requests that specific revision numbers and part numbers be omitted from the proposed rule and that the phrase "current or later revision" be added. The FAA does not concur. It is the FAA's policy not to issue blanket approvals for documents that have not been published yet. Each document is reviewed individually to make sure it fulfills all requirements. Operators may request an alternate method of compliance (AMOC) to utilize later revisions of SB's in accordance with paragraph (b) of this final rule.

One commenter (the manufacturer of the thrust reverser system) requests that the mail stop and telephone number for its technical publications department be changed. The FAA concurs and the information has been changed in this final rule.

One commenter (the engine manufacturer) requests that the engine model designation of the GE CF6-80C2 engine be changed to -80C2A. The FAA concurs and this final rule has been corrected.

After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described previously. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

There are approximately 849 engines of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 193 engines installed on aircraft of US registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 5 work hours per engine to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on US operators is estimated to be $57,900.

The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

Air Transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 39.13 [Amended]

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Middle River Aircraft Systems, Mail Point 46, 103 Chesapeake Park Plaza, Baltimore, MD, 21220-4295, attn: Warranty Support, telephone: (410) 682-0094, fax: (410) 682-0100. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.

William S. Ricci, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 238-7742, fax (781) 238-7199.