Back to AD

AD 95-15-08 ACTIVE

Inspect for Corrosion of Tailplane Assembly
Key Information
AD Number 95-15-08 Status Active
Effective Date August 23, 1995 Issue Date Not specified
Docket Number 94-NM-166-AD Amendment 39-9311
Product Type ["Aircraft"] Product Subtype ["Large Airplane"]
CFR Part --- - Part 39 [60 FR 37818 NO. 141 7/24/95] CFR Section N/A
Citation This information is not available.
Applicability
Manufacturer(s) Vickers-Armstrongs (Aircraft Limited)
Model(s) Viscount 744 Viscount 745D Viscount 810
Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all British Aerospace Model Viscount 744, 754D, and 810 airplanes, that requires an inspection to detect corrosion of the tailplane assemblies, and correction of discrepancies. This amendment is prompted by a report of corrosion on the main spar top and bottom forward boom of the tailplane assemblies and reports of cracking in the upper root joint attachment fitting. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and prevent such cracking or corrosion of the main spar forward booms or the upper root joint attachment fitting, which consequently could lead to the failure of the tailplane assemblies; this condition could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.

Action Required

Final rule

Regulatory Text

95-15-08 BRITISH AEROSPACE REGIONAL AIRCRAFT LIMITED (Formerly British Aerospace Commercial Aircraft Limited, Vickers-Armstrongs Aircraft Limited): Amendment 39-9311. Docket 94-NM-166-AD.
Applicability: All Model Viscount 744, 754D, and 810 airplanes, certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority provided in paragraph (b) of this AD to request approval from the FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an assessment of the effectof the changed configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent cracking or corrosion of the main spar forward booms or the upper root joint attachment fitting, which consequently could lead to the failure of the tailplane assemblies and reduce the controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:

(a) Prior to the accumulation of 8 years of service since date of manufacture of this airplane, or within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, perform an inspection to detect corrosion of the tailplane assemblies, in accordance with British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Limited Viscount Alert Preliminary Technical Leaflet (PTL) 182, Issue 2, dated August 7, 1992 (for Model Viscount 810 airplanes), or Viscount PTL 313, Issue2, dated February 1, 1993 (for Model Viscount 744, 754D, airplanes), as applicable. If corrosion is detected during the inspection, prior to further flight, correct the discrepancies in accordance with the service bulletin. Thereafter, repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 8 years.

NOTE 2: The inspection procedures described in Viscount Alert PTL's 182 and 313 include correction of any cracking found [ref. paragraph D.(6) of the PTL's] and application of corrosion protective treatment [ref. paragraph E.(3) of the PTL's].

(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

NOTE 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Standardization Branch, ANM-113.

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(d) The inspection shall be done in accordance with British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Limited Viscount Alert Preliminary Technical Leaflet (PTL) 182, Issue 2, dated August 7, 1992; or Viscount PTL 313, Issue 2, dated February 1, 1993; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Ltd., Engineering Support Manager, Military Business Unit, Chadderton Works, Greengate, Middleton, Manchester M24 1SA, England. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(e) This amendment becomes effective on August 23, 1995.

Supplementary Information

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to all British Aerospace Model Viscount 744, 754D, and 810 airplanes was published in the Federal Register on April 19, 1995 (60 FR 19549). That action proposed to require an inspection to detect corrosion of the tailplane assemblies, and correction of discrepancies.

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public. The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

The FAA has added a note to paragraph (a) of the final rule to clarify the inspection procedures that are mandated by this AD and described in the Viscount Alert Preliminary Technical Leaflets (PTL) referenced in the AD as appropriate service instructions. The clarifying note indicates that the inspection procedures include the rectification of cracking, if found, and the application of corrosion protective treatment. The FAA has determined that the addition of this clarifying note will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

The FAA estimates that 29 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 160 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $278,400, or $9,600 per airplane.

The total cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.

39.13 - [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Addresses

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from British Aerospace Regional Aircraft Ltd., Engineering Support Manager, Military Business Unit, Chadderton Works, Greengate, Middleton, Manchester M24 1SA, England. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

For Further Information Contact

William Schroeder, Aerospace Engineer, Standardization Branch, ANM-113, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2148; fax (206) 227-1149.