AD 95-15-52

Active

Longitudinal Floor Beams and Keel Beams

Key Information
95-15-52
Active
August 25, 1995
Not specified
95-NM-130-AD
39-9335
Applicability
["Aircraft"]
["Large Airplane"]
The Boeing Company
747-100 Series 747-100B Series 747-100B SUD Series 747-200B Series 747-200C Series 747-200F Series
Summary

This document publishes in the Federal Register an amendment adopting Airworthiness Directive (AD) T95-15-52 that was sent previously to all known U.S. owners and operators of certain Boeing Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes by individual telegrams. This AD requires a revision of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and Airplane Weight and Balance Supplement to restrict cargo loading to a certain level. This AD also provides for the removal of the restrictions following accomplishment of a modification of the longitudinal floor beams. This amendment is prompted by a determination that inadequate strength in the floor beams exists on certain airplanes that have been modified for cargo configurations. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the longitudinal floor beams, which may cause the keel beam to fail and result in rupture of the fuselage.

Action Required

Final rule; request for comments

Regulatory Text

95-15-52 BOEING: Amendment 39-9335. Docket 95-NM-130-AD. \n\n\tApplicability: Model 747-100 series airplanes modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificates (STC) SA2322SO, SA2323SO, or SA5199NM; and Model 747-200 series airplanes modified in accordance with STC's SA4227NM-D or SA5759NM; certificated in any category. \n\n\tNOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must use the authority provided in paragraph (c) of this AD to request approval from the FAA. This approval may address either no action, if the current configuration eliminates the unsafe condition; or different actions necessary to address the unsafe condition described in this AD. Such a request should include an assessment of the effect of the changed configuration on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. In no case does the presence of any modification, alteration, or repair remove any airplane from the applicability of this AD. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.\n \n\tTo prevent structural failure of the longitudinal floor beams and keel beam and the subsequent rupture of the fuselage, accomplish the following: \n\n\t(a)\tWithin 24 clock hours (not flight hours) after the effective date of this AD, revise the Limitations section of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and the Limitations section of the Airplane Weight and Balance Supplement (Model 747-100 or -200 series airplanes) to include the following information. This may be accomplished by inserting a copy of this AD in the AFM. \n\n"1.1 MAIN CARGO DECK LIMITS (ADDITION): \n\nEach of the following payload limits for pallet cargo apply to the main cargo deck floor between Body Stations 1265 and 1480. \n\nNOTE: These limits take precedence over any other payload limits that may appear elsewhere in this or in any other document. \n\n1.\tDo not exceed a linear load of 96.0 pounds per inch between Body Stations 1265 and \n\t1480. \n\n2.\tThe maximum local floor loading in any area located between Body Stations 1265 and \n\t1480 shall not exceed 150 pounds per square foot. \n\n3.\tThe cargo pallets that are located entirely or partially between Body Stations 1265 and \n\t1480 are restricted as follows: \n\n\tA.\tPallets that are 96.0 inches in width and 125.0 inches in length shall not \t\t\texceed a 1.0 g loading of 6,000 pounds. \n\n\tB.\tPallets that are 88.0 inches in width and 125.0 inches in length shall not \t\t\texceed a 1.0 g loading of 5,500 pounds. \n\n\tC.\tPallets that are 88.0 inches in width and 108.0 inches in length shall not \t\t\texceed a 1.0 g loading of 4,800 pounds." \n\n\t(b)\tAccomplishment of a modification of the longitudinal floor beams in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, constitutes terminating action for the limitation requirements of paragraph (a) of this AD. The AFM limitation and Weight and Balance Supplement limitation may be removed following accomplishment of such a modification. \n\n\t(c)\tAn alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO. \n\n\tNOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Seattle ACO. \n\n\t(d)\tThis amendment becomes effective on August 25, 1995, to all persons except those persons to whom it was made immediately effective by telegraphic AD T95-15-52, issued on July 14, 1995, which contained the requirements of this amendment.

Supplementary Information

On July 14, 1995, the FAA issued telegraphic AD T95-15-52, which is applicable to Model 747-100 series airplanes modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) SA2322SO, SA2323SO, or SA5199NM; and Model 747-200 series airplanes modified in accordance with STC SA4227NM-D or SA5759NM. \n\n\tCertain Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes have been converted from a passenger configuration to a freighter configuration in accordance with STC's SA2322SO and SA2323SO (for Model 747-100 series airplanes) and SA4227NM-D (for Model 747-200 series airplanes). These STC's include, as part of their data packages, new Weight and Balance Supplements that specify the maximum allowable linear load per inch (commonly referred to as "running load") along the length of the fuselage. The Supplements increased this limit from 66.7 pounds per inch to 240 pounds per inch between Body Stations (BS) 1000 and 1480. The Supplements also define the maximum area load(expressed in pounds per square foot). The Supplement increased this limit from 100 pounds per square foot to 320 pounds per square foot between BS 1000 and BS 1480. \n\n\tOn January 16, 1990, the FAA issued AD 90-06-06, amendment 39-6490 (55 FR 8374, March 7, 1990), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, to require structural modifications of older airplanes, including a requirement to modify the longitudinal floor beams. Recently, an operator of Model 747 airplanes applied for approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to AD 90-06-06. In reviewing the data to approve this AMOC, the FAA has found that the longitudinal floor beams between BS 1265 and BS 1480 had not been upgraded to withstand the increased running loads that would result from an airplane's conversion to freighter service. These Body Stations comprise a 215 inch-long linear portion of the fuselage over the wheel well section of the airplane. \n\n\tFurthermore, the FAA finds that this sameproblem of inadequate strength in the floor beams exists on Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes for which the type design has been changed to allow operation in accordance with STC's SA5199NM (for Model 747-100 series airplanes) and SA5759NM (for Model 747-200 series airplanes). These two STC's modify the weight and balance limitations of STC's SA2322SO, SA2323SO, and SA4227NM-D. However, these two STC's continue to define the maximum running load at 240 pounds per inch and the maximum area load at 320 pounds per square foot without strengthening the floor beam structure between BS 1000 and BS 1480. \n\n\tThe FAA has determined that a running load of 240 pounds per inch, for the freighter configuration, is above the capability of floor beam structure between BS 1265 and BS 1480. Additionally, the FAA finds that this structure, when loaded to the STC's-allowed limits is not sufficiently strong to sustain limit loads under all of the airspeed and load factor conditions, including those defined by section 25.333, "Flight envelope," and section 25.341, "Gust loads," of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 25.333 and 14 CFR 25.341). Failure of the longitudinal floor beams may cause the keel beam to fail, and result in the rupture of the fuselage. \n\n\tSince the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes having these STC's as part of their type design, the FAA issued Telegraphic AD T95-15-52 to require a revision to the Limitations section of the FAA-approved Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and the Limitations section of the Airplane Weight and Balance Supplement to restrict cargo loading to a suitable level. The level established by this AD is based upon an FAA evaluation of the unmodified floor beam structure. The AD also provides for the removal of the restrictions following accomplishment of a modification of the longitudinal floor beams in accordance with a method approved by the FAA. \n\n\tAs a result of recent communications with the Air Transport Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A Note has been included in this rule to clarify this long-standing requirement. \n\n\tSince it was found that immediate corrective action was required, notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual telegrams issued on July 14, 1995 to all known U.S. owners and operators of the affected Boeing Model 747-100 and -200 series airplanes. These conditions still exist, and the AD is hereby published in the Federal Register as an amendment to section 39.13 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 39.13) to make it effective to all persons.\n\n Comments Invited \n\n\tAlthough this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption "ADDRESSES." All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed. \n\n\tComments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket. \n\n\tCommenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: "Comments to Docket Number 95-NM-130-AD." The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter. \n\n\tThe regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. \n\n\tThe FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and that it is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."\n \nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39\n \n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\n\tAccordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:\n\n PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n\t1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 USC 106(g), 40101, 40113, 44701. § 39.13 - (Amended)\n \n\t2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

AD Assistant

Get AI-powered answers about this AD, check applicability, and find compliance steps.

Sign Up to Unlock
Contact Information

Steven C. Fox, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (206) 227-2777; fax (206) 227-1181.

References
(Federal Register: August 10, 1995 (Volume 60, Number 154))
--- - Part 39 (60 FR 40748 NO. 154 8/10/95)
(Page 40748)
FAA Documents