The FAA has recently received six reports indicating that cracking was found on certain fuselage frames on Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes. This cracking occurred at the location where the outer flange of the frame attaches to the water line (WL) 280.6 longeron (the upper stringerless sidewall longeron) on the left- and right-hand sides of the airplane. Such cracking also has been found in multiple frames of a single airplane. On one airplane, two adjacent frames were severed completely; cracks were found in three more adjacent frames on this same airplane. In each of the cracked frames, the cracks emanated from the fastener hole that attaches the frame to the WL 280.6 longeron at the shear slip cutout.
The cracking appears to be fatigue related, primarily as a result of pressurization loads. An engineering analysis indicates that this cracking initiates when the airplane has accumulated between 20,000 and 25,000 total landings. Loadsanalysis and testing performed during its original certification shows that this airplane model can retain fail-safe load capability with a skin crack extending across two skin bays and one frame severed completely. (To date, no skin cracking has been reported.) Subsequent engineering analysis confirms that the airplane is capable of limit pressurization and fuselage bending loads with two adjacent frames severed completely.
Fatigue cracking in the fuselage frames, if not detected and corrected in a timely manner, could result in reduced structural integrity of the fuselage shell.
The FAA has reviewed and approved Lockheed Alert Service Bulletin 093-53-A271, dated April 25, 1995, including Attachments 1 and 2, which describes procedures for either an external X-ray inspection, or both an internal close visual and an eddy current inspection, to detect cracking or severing of the fuselage frames; and an inspection (using either an eddy current surface scan or a magneto-optic imager) of the adjacent frames and external skin, or repair, if necessary. The alert service bulletin specifies that, for certain airplanes, the inspection area is located between fuselage station (FS) 589 to FS 749 (for the C1 door) and FS 509 to FS 749 (for the C1A door) on the right-hand side of the airplane. (For airplanes on which any cracking or severing is found in the fuselage frames, the alert service bulletin describes procedures for an additional inspection of the fuselage frames between FS 1605 to FS 1745 on the left- and right-hand sides of the airplane.) For certain other airplanes, the alert service bulletin indicates that the inspection area includes all fuselage frames where the frame outer flange attaches to the WL 280.6 longeron (upper stringerless sidewall longeron) on both the left- and right-hand sides of the airplane.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other Lockheed Model L-1011-385 series airplanes of the same type design, this AD is being issued to prevent reduced structural integrity of the fuselage shell. This AD requires either an external X-ray inspection, or both an internal close visual and an eddy current inspection, to detect cracking or severing of the fuselage frames; and an inspection (using either an eddy current surface scan or a magneto-optic imager) of the adjacent frames and external skin, or repair, if necessary. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with the alert service bulletin described previously.
This is considered to be interim action until final action is identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking.
The required compliance time of 120 days for certain airplanes [reference paragraph (b) of this AD] is usually sufficient to allow for a brief comment period before adoption of a final rule. In this AD, however, the compliance time of 120 days for airplanes that have accumulated 20,000 total landings, but less than25,000 total landings, was established based on inspections to date of airplanes in this category along with an engineering evaluation of frame crack propagation rates. The FAA established that compliance time in order to provide an acceptable level of safety commensurate with the compliance time of 25 days for airplanes that have accumulated 25,000 or more total landings. In addition, the FAA selected the 120-day compliance time because of a potential short-term problem with availability of sufficient parts for repairing a fuselage frame if any defect is found; a shorter compliance time might have resulted in the unnecessary removal of airplanes from service pending delivery of repair parts. Nevertheless, the FAA has determined that immediate adoption is necessary in this case because of the importance of initiating the required inspections as soon as possible.
As a result of recent communications with the Air Transport Association (ATA) of America, the FAA has learned that, in general, some operators may misunderstand the legal effect of AD's on airplanes that are identified in the applicability provision of the AD, but that have been altered or repaired in the area addressed by the AD. The FAA points out that all airplanes identified in the applicability provision of an AD are legally subject to the AD. If an airplane has been altered or repaired in the affected area in such a way as to affect compliance with the AD, the owner or operator is required to obtain FAA approval for an alternative method of compliance with the AD, in accordance with the paragraph of each AD that provides for such approvals. A note has been included in this rule to clarify this long-standing requirement.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption "ADDRESSES." All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.
Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.
Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: "Comments to Docket Number 95-NM-82-AD." The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.
The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and that it is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.
39.13 - [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive: