AD 2021-07-11

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Trent 1000-A2, 1000- AE2, 1000-C2, 1000-CE2, 1000-D2, 1000-E2, 1000-G2, 1000-H2, 1000-J2, 1000-K2, and 1000-L2 model turbofan engines. This AD was prompted by the manufacturer's analysis which determined that cracks may initiate in the front seal fins and cause cracks in the low-pressure turbine (LPT) disk. This AD requires repetitive inspection of the seal fins and, depending on the results of the inspection, replacement of the LPT disk before further flight. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Final rule.

The Amendment \n\n\n\tAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\n\n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive: \n\n2021-07-11 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Type Certificate previously held by Rolls-Royce plc): Amendment 39-21488; Docket No. FAA-2020-1138; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01258-E. \n\n(a) Effective Date \n\n\n\tThis airworthiness directive (AD) is effective May 11, 2021. \n\n(b) Affected ADs \n\n\n\tNone. \n\n(c) Applicability \n\n\n\tThis AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Type Certificate previously held by Rolls-Royce plc) (RRD) Trent 1000-A2, 1000-AE2, 1000-C2, 1000-CE2, 1000-D2, 1000-E2, 1000-G2, 1000-H2, 1000-J2, 1000-K2, and 1000-L2 model turbofanengines with a low- pressure turbine (LPT) stage 3 disk with part number (P/N) KH36323, or an LPT stage 4 disk with P/N KH33943, installed. \n\n(d) Subject \n\n\n\tJoint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7250, Turbine Section. \n\n(e) Unsafe Condition \n\n\n\tThis AD was prompted by the manufacturer's analysis of certain LPT disks in service. The analysis determined that, due to rubbing contact with interstage static seals, cracks may initiate in the front seal fins, which could lead to cracks in the LPT stage 3 and stage 4 disks. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent failure of the LPT disk. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in uncontained LPT disk release, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane. \n\n(f) Compliance \n\n\n\tComply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. \n\n(g) Required Actions \n\n\n\t(1) During each refurbishment shop visit after the effective date of this AD, inspect the seal fins of the LPT stage 3 diskand the LPT stage 4 disk in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 3.B and 3.C, of Rolls-Royce Alert Non- Modification Service Bulletin Trent 1000 72-AK416, Initial Issue, dated June 29, 2020. \n\t(i) For an engine that is in a refurbishment shop visit on the effective date of this AD, if the LPT stage 3 disk and LPT stage 4 disk are exposed, perform the inspection before the engine is returned to service. \n\t(ii) (Reserved) \n\t(2) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, any crack is detected, before further flight, remove the affected LPT disk and replace it with a part eligible for installation. \n\n(h) Definitions \n\n\n\t(1) For the purpose of this AD, a ''refurbishment shop visit'' is the induction of an engine into the shop for maintenance that involves removing the blades from a disk in the intermediate- pressure turbine and replacing a disk in either the high-pressure compressor or high-pressure turbine. \n\t(2) For the purpose of this AD, a ''part eligible for installation'' is an LPT stage 3 disk or LPT stage 4 disk with zero flight cycles since new, or an LPT stage 3 disk or LPT stage 4 disk that has passed the inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. \n\n(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) \n\n\n\t(1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the person identified in Related Information. You may email your request to: ANE-AD-AMOC@faa.gov. \n\t(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. \n\n(j) Related Information \n\n\n\t(1) For more information about this AD, contact Kevin M. Clark, Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone: (781) \n\n((Page 17713)) \n\n238-7088; fax: (781) 238-7199; email: kevin.m.clark@faa.gov. \n\t(2) Refer to European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020-0195, dated September 8, 2020, for more information. You may examine the EASA AD in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-1138. \n\n(k) Material Incorporated by Reference \n\n\n\t(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. \n\t(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. \n\t(i) Rolls-Royce Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin Trent 1000 72-AK416, Initial Issue, dated June 29, 2020. \n\t(ii) (Reserved) \n\t(3) For Rolls-Royce service information identified in this AD, contact Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby, DE24 8BJ, United Kingdom; phone: +44 (0)1332 242424; website: https://www.rolls-royce.com/contact-us.aspx. \n\t(4) You may view this service information at FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (781) 238-7759. \n\t(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. \n\n\n\tIssued on March 23, 2021. Lance T. Gant, Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. (FR Doc. 2021-06952 Filed 4-5-21; 8:45 am) BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Background \n\n\n\tThe FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) Trent 1000-A2, 1000-AE2, 1000-C2, 1000- CE2, 1000-D2, 1000-E2, 1000-G2, 1000-H2, 1000-J2, 1000-K2, and 1000-L2 model turbofan engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December 21, 2020 (85 FR 82970). The NPRM was prompted by the manufacturer's analysis which determined that cracks may initiate in the front seal fins and cause cracks in the LPT disk. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require repetitive inspection of the seal fins and, depending on the results of the inspection, replacement of the LPT disk before further flight. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. \n\tThe European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA AD 2020-0195, dated September 8, 2020 (referred to after this as ''the MCAI''), to address the unsafe condition on these products. The MCAI states: \n\n\n\tAnalysis of certain LP turbine discs in service has determined that, due to rubbing contact with interstage static seals, cracks may initiate in the front seal fins which could lead to cracks in the disc of the affected parts, as defined in this (EASA) AD. \n\tThis condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead to crack propagation, possibly resulting in LP turbine disc failure and high-energy debris release, with consequent damage to, and reduced control of, the aeroplane. \n\tTo address this potential unsafe condition, Rolls-Royce published the NMSB to provide inspection instructions. \n\tFor the reason described above, this (EASA) AD requires repetitive ultra-high sensitivity fluorescent penetrant inspections of the seal fins of the affected parts and, depending on findings, replacement of affected parts. \n\n\n\tYou may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-1138. \n\nDiscussion of Final Airworthiness Directive \n\nComments \n\n\n\tThe FAA received comments from two commenters. The commenters were Boeing Commercial Airplanes (Boeing) and Rolls-Royce. Rolls-Royce requested a change that resulted in an update to this AD. Boeing supported the AD as written. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. \n\nRequest To Change Engine Shop Visit to Refurbishment Shop Visit \n\n\n\tRolls-Royce requested that the FAA revise the references in paragraphs (g)(1) and (h)(1) of this AD from ''engine shop visit'' to ''refurbishment shop visit.'' Rolls-Royce reasoned that the FAA introduced a different inspection frequency to that defined in Rolls- Royce Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) Trent 1000 72-AK416, Initial Issue, dated June 29, 2020, and EASA AD 2020-0195, dated September 8, 2020. Rolls-Royce further reasoned that a pair of mating flanges may be separated at most engine shop visits even when undertaking specific hospital shop or check and repair workscopes. Rolls-Royce indicated that it was not their intent, nor is it required by the safety case presented to and agreed by EASA, to strip and inspect the LPT seals at hospital or check and repair shop visits. \n\tThe FAA agrees. The FAA changed references in paragraphs (g)(1) and (h)(1) of this AD from ''engine shop visit'' to ''refurbishment shop visit.'' The FAA also updated paragraph (h)(1) of this AD to define a ''refurbishment shop visit.'' \n\nSupport for the AD \n\n\n\tBoeing expressed support for the AD as written. \n\nConclusion \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. Except forminor editorial changes and any other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator. \n\nRelated Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed Rolls-Royce NMSB Trent 1000 72-AK416, Initial Issue, dated June 29, 2020 (the NMSB). The NMSB provides instructions for inspecting the LPT stage 3 disk and the LPT stage 4 disk. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tThe FAA estimates that this AD affects 26 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. \n\tThe FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD: \n\n\n\tEstimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost per Cost on U.S. \n\tActionLabor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspect the LPT stage 3 disk and LPT 80 work-hours x $85 per $0 $6,800 $176,800 \n\tstage 4 disk. hour = $6,800. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\n((Page 17712)) \n\n\n\tThe FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary replacement that would be required based on the results of the required inspection. The agency has no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this replacement: \n\n\n\tOn-Condition Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost per \n\tAction Labor cost Parts cost product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replace LPT stage 3 disk...................... 0 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $336,158 $336,158 Replace LPT stage 4 disk...................... 0 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 406,345 406,345 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tThe FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tThis AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD: \n\t(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, \n\t(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and \n\t(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\nList ofSubjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.