Background \n\n\n\tThe European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA AD 2020-0201R1, dated September 25, 2020 (referred to after this as ''the MCAI''), to address an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states: \n\n\n\tSeveral occurrences of engine power fluctuations have been reported during ground tests on engines equipped with an affected part. The investigation results determined that one or more rubber cuff sealings of the cage reinforcement inside the main metering valve of the FCU was wrongly installed, which reduced the cuff ability to properly seal the FCU working pressure. \n\tThis condition, if not corrected, may lead to engine surge, fluctuations, or loss of engine power, possibly resulting in loss of control of control of the aeroplane. \n\tTo address this potential unsafe condition, GEAC issued the ASB, providing replacement instructions, and EASA issued Emergency AD 2020-0201-E to require, for engines having an affected part installed, replacement with a serviceable part. That (EASA) AD also prohibited (re)installation of an affected part. \n\tSince that (EASA) AD was issued, it was discovered that an FCU s/n was incorrectly specified in the ASB and, consequently, wrongly quoted in the EASA AD. GEAC revised the ASB to correct that error and this (EASA) AD is revised to amend Appendix 1 (Group 3, s/n 903004 instead of 903008) accordingly. \n\n\n\tYou may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0979. \n\nFAA's Determination \n\n\n\tThis product has been approved by EASA and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the European Community, EASA has notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI. The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency evaluated all the relevant information provided by EASA and has determined that the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design. \n\nRelated Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed GE Aviation Czech Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) ASB-H75-73-00-00-0038 (01), ASB-H80-73-00-00-0074 (01), ASB-H85-73-00- 00-0032 (01), ASB-M601D-73-00-00-0066 (01), ASB-M601E-73-00-00-0097 (01), ASB-M601F-73-00-00-0050 (01), and ASB-M601T-73-00-00-0040 (01) (single document; formatted as service bulletin identifier (revision number)), dated September 24, 2020. The ASB describes procedures for removing and replacing the FCU and identifies the affected FCUs. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES. \n\nAD Requirements \n\n\n\tThis AD requires the removal and replacement of the FCU. \n\nDifferences Between This AD and the MCAI \n\n\n\tEASA AD 2020-0201R1, dated September 25, 2020, applies to GEAC M601D, M601D-1, M601D-11, M601D-11NZ, M601E, M601E-11, M601E-11A, M601E-11AS, M601E-11S, M601E-21, M601F, M601F-22, M601F-32, M601FS, M601T, H75-200, H80-100, H80-200, and H85-200 model turboprop engines. This AD does not include GEAC M601D, M601D-1, M601D-11NZ, M601E, M601E- 21, M601F-22, M601F-32, M601FS, and M601T model turboprop engines as they are not type certificated in the U.S. \n\nJustification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective Date \n\n\n\tSection 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ''good cause,'' finds that those procedures are ''impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, \n\n((Page 71230)) \n\nupon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking comment prior to issuance. Further, Section 553(d) of the APA authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days, upon a finding of good cause. \n\tAn unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies foregoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule. During ground tests performed by the manufacturer on engines equipped with affected FCUs, several occurrences of engine power fluctuations were reported. After investigation, the manufacturer determined that one or more rubber cuff sealings of the cage reinforcement inside the main metering valve of the FCU was incorrectly installed, which reduced the cuff sealing's ability to properly seal the FCU working pressure. This unsafe condition, caused by a manufacturing quality issue, may result in loss of engine thrust control and reduced control of the airplane. \n\tFCUs installed on Group 1 engines have the highest risk of malfunction. To maintain an acceptable level of safety, these FCUs must be replaced within 10 flight hours (FHs) after the effective date of this AD. FCUs installed on Group 2 and Group 3 engines have a lower risk of malfunction than those installed on Group 1 engines. Therefore, for Group 2 engines, FCUs must be replaced within 50 FHs or 60 days after the effective day of this AD, whichever occurs first. For Group 3 engines, FCUs must be replaced within 100 FHs or 180 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first. \n\tThe FAA considers the removal of the affected FCUs to be an urgent safety issue. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). \n\tIn addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days, for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to foregonotice and comment. \n\nComments Invited \n\n\n\tThe FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include the docket number FAA-2020-0979 and Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01313-E at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this final rule because of those comments. \n\tExcept for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this final rule. \n\nConfidential Business Information \n\n\n\tCBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ''PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Barbara Caufield, Aviation Safety Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. \n\nRegulatory Flexibility Act \n\n\n\tThe requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tThe FAA estimates that this AD affects 12 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. \n\tThe FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD: \n\n\n\tEstimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost per Cost on U.S. \n\tAction Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remove and replace FCU................ 5 work-hours x $85 per $25,000$25,425 $305,100 \n\thour = $425. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\tThe FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. According to the manufacturer, however, all of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected operators. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. ''Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tThe FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, andprocedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tThis AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\n((Page 71231)) \n\n\n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, and \n\t(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.