Comments Invited \n\n\n\tThis AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and the FAA did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, the FAA invites you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit them only one time. \n\tExcept for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will file in the docket all \n\n((Page 59417)) \n\ncomments received, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact withFAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. The FAA will consider all the comments received and may conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments. \n\nConfidential Business Information \n\n\n\tConfidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this final rule contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this final rule, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ''PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this final rule. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Matt Fuller, AD Program Manager, Continued Operational Safety Branch, Airworthiness Products Section, General Aviation and Rotorcraft Unit, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817-222-5110; email matthew.fuller@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. \n\nDiscussion \n\n\n\tThe FAA issued AD 2000-22-19, Amendment 39-11967 (65 FR 68071, November 14, 2000) (''AD 2000-22-19''), for Eurocopter France (now Airbus Helicopters) Model SA330F, G, and J helicopters with a T/R blade part number (P/N) 330A12-0000-(all dash numbers), 330A12-0000-(all dash numbers), or 330A12-0006-(all dash numbers), installed. \n\tAD 2000-22-19 required, within a compliance time interval based on whether a de-icing system was installed, repetitively inspecting each T/R blade for skin debonding and eddy current inspecting for a crack. The FAA issued AD 2000-22-19to prevent fatigue cracking of a T/R blade, failure of a T/R blade, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. \n\nActions Since AD 2000-22-19 Was Issued \n\n\n\tSince the FAA issued AD 2000-22-19, EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, issued EASA AD No. 2016-0059-E, dated March 22, 2016 (EASA AD 2016-0059-E), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter France, Aerospatiale) Model SA 330 J helicopters. EASA AD 2016-0059-E retains the requirements of Direction G(eacute)n(eacute)rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) France AD 87-032- 052(B)R3, dated January 23, 1991, which it supersedes, and also mandates improved service instructions. \n\tAirbus Helicopters issued the improved service instructions in Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21, 2016, to extend the eddy current inspection area and specify new tooling to inspect the extended area. \n\tAlso, since the FAA issuedAD 2000-22-19, it was identified that AD 2000-22-19 inadvertently listed T/R blade P/N 330A12-0000-(all dash numbers) twice in its applicability and omitted T/R blade P/N 330A12- 0005-(all dash numbers). This final rule removes T/R blade P/N 330A12- 0000-(all dash numbers) altogether from the applicability because these part-numbered T/R blades have been retired from the fleet and expands the applicability by adding helicopters with T/R blade P/N 330A12-0005- (all dash numbers) installed. \n\tAdditionally, at the request of Airbus Helicopters, Model SA330F and G helicopters have been removed from the FAA Type Certificate Data Sheet (TCDS). According to Airbus Helicopters, none of these aircraft models are in existence. EASA, the state of design, has also removed these models from its TCDS. As a result, the FAA is removing these models from the applicability. \n\nFAA's Determination \n\n\n\tThese helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA about the unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is issuing this AD after evaluating all of the information provided by EASA and determining the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design. \n\nRelated Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 \n\n\n\tAirbus Helicopters has issued Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21, 2016, for Model SA330J helicopters with certain T/R blades with and without a de-icing system installed. This service information specifies procedures for a visual and in-depth inspection of the T/R blades for skin debonding and an eddy current inspection of the T/R blades for a crack using various crack detectors. \n\tThis service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. \n\nAD Requirements \n\n\n\tThis AD requires within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the effective date of this AD or within 30 hours TIS after last inspecting the T/R blades as required by paragraph (a) of AD 2000-22-19, whichever occurs first, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS for blades with de-icing systems installed or 30 hours TIS for blades without de-icing systems installed: \n\tAccomplishing a visual and in-depth inspection of each T/R blade for debonding. If there is debonding within allowable limits, this AD requires repairing or replacing the T/R blade before further flight. If there is debonding that exceeds allowable limits, this AD requires replacing the T/R blade before further flight. \n\tEddy current inspecting each blade for a crack. If there is a crack, this AD requires replacing the T/R blade before further flight. \n\tThis AD also prohibits installing an affected T/R blade on any helicopter unless it passes the inspectionsrequired by this AD. \n\nDifferences Between This AD and the EASA AD \n\n\n\tThe EASA AD requires returning a T/R blade with debonding that exceeds allowable limits or a crack to Airbus Helicopters, whereas this AD requires replacing the T/R blade instead. \n\nRegulatory Flexibility Act \n\n\n\tThe requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required. \n\n((Page 59418)) \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tThe FAA estimates that this AD affects 15 helicopters of U.S. Registry. Labor rates are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on these numbers, the FAA estimates that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. \n\tInspecting the T/R blades for debonding takes about 0.75 work-hour for an estimated cost of $64 per helicopter and $960 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle. Eddy current inspecting the T/R blades for a crack takes about 1.75 work-hours for an estimated cost of $149 per helicopter and $2,235 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle. \n\tIf required, replacing a T/R blade takes about 4 work-hours and parts cost about $19,000, for an estimated cost of $19,340. \n\nFAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date \n\n\n\tSection 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ''good cause'' finds that those procedures are ''impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without seeking comment prior to the rulemaking. \n\tAn unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adoption. The FAAhas found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because fatigue cracking in a T/R blade could lead to failure of a T/R blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. This type of fatigue cracking in a T/R blade could cause a pilot to perform an emergency landing. Because these helicopters primarily conduct operations over water or forested mountains, the FAA determined the corrective action must be completed within 30 hours TIS, a time period of up to approximately two months based on the average flight-hour utilization rates of these helicopters. Therefore, notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and contrary to public interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). In addition, for the reasons stated above, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tThe FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tThe FAA determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD: \n\t1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, and \n\t2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.