AD 2020-17-08

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Pacific Aerospace Limited Model 750XL airplanes with wing lightning protection panels installed. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as insufficient electrical bonding of the wing lightning protection panels. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Final rule; request for comments

Adoption of the Amendment \n\n\n\tAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\n\n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD): \n\n2020-17-08 Pacific Aerospace Limited: Amendment 39-21213; Docket No. FAA-2020-0769; Product Identifier 2018-CE-033-AD. \n\n((Page 52045)) \n\n(a) Effective Date \n\n\n\tThis AD becomes effective September 14, 2020. \n\n(b) Affected ADs \n\n\n\tNone. \n\n(c) Applicability \n\n\n\tThis AD applies to Pacific Aerospace Limited Model 750XL airplanes, certificated in any category, with a wing lightning protection panel installed. \n\n(d) Subject \n\n\n\tAir Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 39: Electrical Wiring. \n\n(e) Reason \n\n\n\tThis AD was promptedby mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) issued by the aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as insufficient electrical bonding of the wing lightning protection panels. The FAA is issuing this AD to detect and correct insufficient electrical bonding between the wing lightning protection panels and the airframe that, in the event of a lightning strike in that area, could result in an inflight fire. \n\n\n\t(f) Compliance \n\n\n\tComply with the actions listed in paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. \n\n(g) For Airplanes With Short Range Wings \n\n\n\tFor airplanes approved for operation under instrument flight rules (IFR), do the following actions within 30 days after September 14, 2020 (the effective date of this AD), and for airplanes not approved for operation under IFR, do the following actions within 60 days after September 14, 2020 (the effective date of this AD): \n\t(1) Inspect each wing upper surface by following paragraphs 2.A.(1) through 2.A.(3) of the Accomplishment Instructions--Short Range Wing in Pacific Aerospace Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2, dated December 15, 2017 (PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2). \n\t(i) Using a mill-ohmmeter, determine the resistance between the test point on each panel and the fuel cap. \n\t(ii) If the resistance is greater than 100 milliohms, before further flight, repair the upper surface electrical bonding by following paragraph 2.B. of the Accomplishment Instructions--Short Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\t(2) Inspect each wing lower surface by following paragraphs 2.C.(1) through 2.C.(3) of the Accomplishment Instructions--Short Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\t(i) Using a mill-ohmmeter, determine the resistance between each test point and the airframe. \n\t(ii) If the resistance is greater than 100 milliohms, before further flight, repairthe lower surface electrical bonding by following paragraph 2.D. of the Accomplishment Instructions--Short Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\n(h) For Airplanes With Extended Range Wings \n\n\n\tFor airplanes approved for operation under IFR, do the following actions within 30 days after September 14, 2020 (the effective date of this AD), and for airplanes not approved for operation under IFR, do the following actions within 60 days after September 14, 2020 (the effective date of this AD): \n\t(1) Inspect each wing upper surface by following paragraphs 3.A.(1) through 3.A.(3) of the Accomplishment Instructions--Extended Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\t(i) Using a mill-ohmmeter, determine the resistance between the test point on each panel and the fuel cap. \n\t(ii) If the resistance is greater than 100 milliohms, before further flight, repair the upper surface electrical bonding by following paragraph 3.B. of the Accomplishment Instructions-- Extended Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\t(2) Inspect each wing lower surface by following paragraphs 3.C.(1) through 3.C.(3) of the Accomplishment Instructions--Extended Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\t(i) Using a mill-ohmmeter, determine the resistance between each test point and the airframe. \n\t(ii) If the resistance is greater than 100 milliohms, before further flight, repair the lower surface electrical bonding by following paragraph 3.D. of the Accomplishment Instructions-- Extended Range Wing in PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2. \n\n(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance \n\n\n\tThe Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4144; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: mike.kiesov@faa.gov. Before using anyapproved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO. \n\n\n\t(j) Related Information \n\n\n\tRefer to MCAI Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand AD DCA/ 750XL/21, dated December 15, 2017, for related information. You may examine the MCAI on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0769. \n\n(k) Material Incorporated by Reference \n\n\n\t(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. \n\t(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. \n\t(i) Pacific Aerospace Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2, dated December 15, 2017. \n\t(ii) (Reserved). \n\t(3) For Pacific Aerospace service information identified in this AD, contact Pacific Aerospace Limited, Airport Road, Hamilton, Private Bag 3027, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand; phone: +64 7843 6144; fax: +64 843 6134; email: pacific@aerospace.co.nz; internet: https://www.aerospace.co.nz. \n\t(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0769. \n\t(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. \n\n\n\tIssued on August 12, 2020. Lance T. Gant, Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification Service. (FR Doc. 2020-18448 Filed 8-21-20; 8:45 am) BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

Discussion \n\n\n\tThe Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand (CAA) has issued AD DCA/750XL/21, dated December 15, 2017 (referred to after this as ''the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for Pacific Aerospace Limited Model 750XL airplanes with wing lightning protection panels installed. To accompany the MCAI, the CAA issued Notification of Airworthiness Directive issued for New Zealand Aeronautical Products IAW ICAO Annex 8, dated December 15, 2017, which states: \n\n\n\tThis (CAA) AD with effective date 22 December 2017 mandates an electrical bonding inspection of the wing lightning protection panels per the requirements in Pacific Aerospace Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) PACSB/XL/092 issue 2, dated 15 December 2017, or later approved revision. \n\tThe (CAA) AD is prompted by the possibility that there may be insufficient electrical bonding between the lightning protection panels and the airframe. \n\n\n\tDue to a report of an airplane with wing lightning strike panels that were not bonded to the airframe and without information confirming whether the bonding was performed properly during the assembly process, a check of all airplanes in operation is necessary. \n\tIn addition to the inspection of the electrical bonding on the wing lightning protection panels, the MCAI also requires repair of any insufficient electrical bonding found during the inspection. You may examine the MCAI on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0769. \n\nRelated Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed Pacific Aerospace Service Bulletin PACSB/XL/092, Issue 2, dated December 15, 2017. The service information contains procedures for inspecting the electrical bonding (verification testing) on the wing lightning protection panels and repairing the electrical bonding if insufficient bonding is found during the inspection. This service information is reasonably available because theinterested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section. \n\nDifferences Between This AD and the MCAI \n\n\n\tThe MCAI requires compliance before further flight for aircraft operating under instrument flight rules (IFR) and before February 15, 2018, for aircraft operating under visual flight rules. The FAA's engineering assessment determined an emergency AD was not warranted. Therefore, this AD requires compliance within 30 days for aircraft approved to \n\n((Page 52044)) \n\noperate under IFR and within 60 days for aircraft not approved to operate under IFR. \n\nFAA's Determination and Requirements of the AD \n\n\n\tThis product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing this AD because the agency evaluated all information provided by the State of Design Authority and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. \n\nFAA's Determination of the Effective Date \n\n\n\tAn unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because if not corrected the unsafe condition, in the event of a lightning strike, could result in an inflight fire. The risk assessment received by the FAA, and reconfirmed in July of 2020, indicates that urgent action is required. The corrective actions necessary to mitigate this unsafe condition must be accomplished within 30 days for IFR operation and 60 days for VFR operations. Therefore, the FAA finds good cause that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable. In addition, for the reasons stated above, the FAA finds that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. \n\nComments Invited \n\n\n\tThis AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment. However, the FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the Docket Number FAA-2020- 0769 and Product Identifier 2019-CE-033-AD at the beginning of your comments. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this final rule because of those comments. \n\tExcept for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about this final rule. \n\nConfidential Business Information \n\n\n\tCBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ''PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tThe FAA estimates that this AD will affect 22 products of U.S. registry. The FAA also estimates that it will take about 5 work-hours per product to comply with the basic inspection requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. \n\tBased on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be $9,350, or $425 per product. \n\tIn addition, the FAA estimates that any necessary follow-on repair actions will take about 11 work-hours and require parts costing $200, for a cost of $1,135 per product. The FAA has no way of determining the number of products that may need these actions. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106,describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tThe FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Flexibility Act \n\n\n\tThe requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tThe FAA has determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, and \n\t(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.