Discussion
The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 14, 2019 (84 FR 21268). The NPRM was prompted by reports of cracked elevator PCU brackets on the horizontal stabilizer rear spar and cracking on the elevator front spar. The NPRM proposed to require one-time inspections for cracks and damage of the elevator PCU brackets and surrounding area, horizontal stabilizer rear spar, and elevator front spar, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary.
The FAA is issuing this AD to address failure of an elevator PCU bracket or fracture of the front spar into two segments; either structural failure may cause a jam in one elevator or a loss of airplane pitch control if both elevators are affected.
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2018-34, dated December 17, 2018 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. The MCAI states:
There have been five in-service reports of cracked elevator power control unit (PCU) brackets on the horizontal stabilizer rear spar, and two reports of cracking on the elevator front spar. In one case, the PCU bracket cracking led to detachment of the bracket during pushback. An investigation found that the force-fight loads induced by elevator PCUs not rigged to the required tolerance is the common factor in cracking of both the elevator PCU bracket and of the elevator front spar. A secondary contributor to the elevator PCU bracket cracking is the bracket flange preload that may be induced during production installation. Failure of an elevator PCU bracket or progression of the elevator front spar cracking into two segments may cause the affected elevator to jam. Failure of an elevator bracket on both elevators, or progression of elevator front spar cracking into two segments on both elevators, could cause a loss of aeroplane pitch control.
This [Canadian] AD mandates a one-time inspection of the elevator PCU brackets, the horizontal stabilizer rear spar and elevator front spar with reporting of inspection findings. Any brackets found cracked are to be replaced with new brackets with improved strength. For any spar found cracked, obtain instructions to repair the spar from Bombardier and repair the spar accordingly. Additional corrective action may be considered depending on the results of the inspections findings.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019- 0322.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule.The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Remove Certain Service Information Procedures
Horizon Air requested that the FAA change the language in the introductory text of paragraph (g) of the proposed AD from mandating ``the Accomplishment Instructions'' in the service information to mandating only the section that corrects the unsafe condition. Horizon Air stated that the Accomplishment Instructions, Part A, ``Job Set- up,'' and Part C, ``Close Out,'' do not directly correct the unsafe condition. Horizon Air stated that incorporating these two sections as a requirement in the AD restricts an operator's ability to accomplish other maintenance in conjunction with the required actions to correct the unsafe condition.
The FAA agrees with the commenter's request to exclude the ``Job Set-up'' and ``Close Out'' sections of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84- 55-09, dated June 7, 2018. The FAA has revised the introductory text of paragraph (g) of this AD to require accomplishment of Section 3.B, Part A, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-55-09, dated June 7, 2018, and the FAA has revised paragraph (g)(1) of this AD to require accomplishment of Section 3.B, Part B, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-55-09, dated June 7, 2018.
Request To Revise Company Name and Email Address
Horizon Air requested that the FAA update the contact information for reporting in the introductory text of paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. Horizon Air pointed out that De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Ltd is now the design approval holder (DAH) for the Q400 aircraft.
The FAA agrees with the commenter's request. The FAA has updated the address information accordingly in this final rule.
As a note, there is a difference between the commercial designation and the model designation on the U.S. type certificate data sheet (TCDS). ``Q400'' is the commercial designation, while Bombardier, Inc., Model DHC-8-400 is the designation on the TCDS. The FAA uses the model designation on the TCDS to define the applicability in ADs and, as a result, have not changed the applicability of this AD. The FAA is in the process of changing the TCDS to reflect the name change for these models. The FAA will use the name identified in the current TCDS so as not to delay issuance of the final rule. Once the TCDS has been changed, the FAA will use the new name in subsequent ADs.
Conclusion
The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. The FAA has determined that these minor changes:
[[Page 46436]]
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.
The FAA also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Bombardier has issued Service Bulletin 84-55-09, dated June 7, 2018. This service information describes procedures for one-time detailed visual and fluorescent penetrant inspections for cracks and damage of the elevator PCU brackets (including the surrounding area), horizontal stabilizer rear spar, and elevator front spar, and related investigative and corrective actions if necessary. The related investigative action is an eddy current inspection for cracking of certain mating holes of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar. Corrective actions include replacement of the elevator PCU brackets and repair of the horizontal stabilizer rear spar and elevator front spar.
This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have accessto it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 54 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions * ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,105............... $0 $1,105 $59,670 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Table does not include estimated costs for reporting.
The FAA estimates that it would take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the reporting requirement in this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, the FAA estimates the cost of reporting the inspection results on U.S. operators to be $4,590, or $85 per product.
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on- condition actions that would be required based on the results of any required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 18 work-hours x $85 per hour = $0 $1,530
$1,530......................... ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor,and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB control number. The control number for the collection of information required by this AD is 2120- 0056. The paperwork cost associated with this AD has been detailed in the Costs of Compliance section of this document and includes time for reviewing instructions, as well as completing and reviewing the collection of information. Therefore, all reporting associated with this AD is mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, ATTN: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issuerules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
[[Page 46437]]