Discussion \n\n\n\tThe EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E, dated February 21, 2019 (''EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E'') (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ''the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Dassault Aviation Model Falcon 10 airplanes. The MCAI states: \n\n\n\tOccurrences were reported, involving Falcon 10 aeroplanes, where wing anti-ice outboard flexible hoses P/N (part number) 115S018A315 were found damaged. Investigation shows that those damages are most likely due to the installation process. \n\tThis condition, if not corrected, could lead to a loss of performance of the wing anti-ice protection system not annunciated to the pilot, possibly resulting in reduced control of the aeroplane. \n\tTo address this potential unsafe condition, Dassault published the SB (Alert Service Bulletin F10-338) to provide inspectioninstructions. \n\tFor the reason described above, this (EASA) AD requires a one- time inspection of the wing anti-ice outboard flexible hoses and, depending on findings, further inspection(s) or replacement. This (EASA) AD also provides instructions for installation of an affected part on an aeroplane. \n\nRelated IBR Material Under 1 CFR Part 51 \n\n\n\tEASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E describes procedures for repetitive detailed inspections for damage of wing anti-ice outboard flexible hoses having P/N 115S018A315, and replacement of affected wing anti-ice outboard flexible hoses. This material is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section, and it is publicly available through the EASA website. \n\nFAA's Determination \n\n\n\tThis product has been approved by the aviation authority of another country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design. \n\nRequirements of This AD \n\n\n\tThis AD requires accomplishing the actions specified in EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E described previously, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD. \n\nExplanation of Required Compliance Information \n\n\n\tIn the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD process, the FAA worked with EASA to develop a process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. As a result, EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E is incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This AD, therefore, requires compliance with the provisions specified in EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this AD. Service information specified in EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E that is required for compliance with EASA Emergency AD 2019-0040-E is available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0115. \n\nFAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date \n\n\n\tAn unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because damaged wing anti-ice outboard flexible hoses could lead to a loss of performance of the wing anti-ice protection system that is not annunciated to the pilot, and could result in reduced control of the airplane. Therefore, we find good cause that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable. In addition, for the reasons stated above, we find that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. \n\nComments Invited \n\n\n\tThis AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ''Docket No. FAA-2019-0115; Product Identifier 2019-NM-024-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD based on those comments. \n\tWe will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tWe estimate that this AD affects 54 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: \n\n\n\tEstimated Costs for Required Actions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost per Cost on U.S. \n\tLabor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 work-hours x $85 per hour = $765........................... $0 $765 $41,310 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\n((Page 7803)) \n\n\n\tWe estimate the following costs to do any necessary on-condition action that would be required based on the results of any required actions. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need this on-condition action: \n\n\n\tEstimated Costs of On-Condition Actions ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \n\tCost per \n\tLabor cost Parts cost product ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9 work-hours x $85 per hour = $765.... $317 $1,082 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ''General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress chargesthe FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\tThis AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tWe determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This ADwill not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; \n\t2. Is not a ''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); \n\t3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and \n\t4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.