Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on August 2, 2018 (83 FR 37766). The NPRM was prompted by leakage of shrouded pipe T-boxes in the potable water system. The NPRM proposed to require replacement of the affected potable water T-boxes and clamps with new parts.
We are issuing this AD to address the possible leakage of water into the avionics bay. This condition, if not corrected, could lead to the loss of systems/equipment located inside the avionics bay and possible loss of control of the airplane.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD 2018-0111R1, dated May 30, 2018 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct anunsafe condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes. The MCAI states:
During a pressure test on the A350 Final Assembly Line (FAL), leakage was observed on the potable water system shrouded pipes, due to a crack failure on the T-Boxes. Leakage of a primary pipe may cause water ingress into the avionics bay. Additionally, during another pressure proof test on the A350 FAL, loss of torque was detected on the clamps used to attach the shrouded pipes on the T- Boxes.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead to loss of systems/ equipment located inside the avionics bay, possibly resulting in an unsafe condition.
Prompted by these findings, Airbus developed improved potable water T-Boxes and clamps, which are embodied in production through Airbus mod 111435 or mod 111440, and introduced in service through the SB [Service Bulletin A350-38-P004].
For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires replacement of the affected potable water shrouded pipe T-Boxes and clamps with new parts.
This [EASA] AD was revised to exclude post-mod 111440 aeroplanes from the Applicability.
[[Page 56710]]
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018- 0637.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Reference Maintenance Procedure (MP) Task for Additional Information
Delta Air Lines (DAL) requested that we reference Airbus MP Task A350-A-20-51-64-01001-25BA-A in the proposed AD as a guide for installing and torqueing the hardware. DAL stated that the additional information provided in the MP task would ensure a more complete set of installation instructions.
We agree with the commenter, because the referenced MP task does provide proper torque values. We have added a reference to the specified MP task as a note to paragraph (g) of this AD.
Request To Remove Leak Test Requirement
DAL requested that we remove the system leak test requirement from the proposed AD. DAL stated that Airbus gave them permission to forego the test because the potable water system requires no maintenance, and that the test is therefore unnecessary.
We disagree with removing the required test, because we have insufficient evidence to warrant removing a required test from this AD for all operators. DAL may request approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC), if it can provide sufficient data to substantiate that skipping the test would provide an acceptable level of safety for DAL's fleet. We have not changed this AD in this regard.
Request To Provide Alternative Hardware Solution
DAL requested that we modify the proposed AD by raising the required torque value or requiring a lockwire for the clamp screw. DAL asserted that the torque value given in the service information is very low for this type of clamp, and that if the screw loses its torque, the clamp could depart the shell and fall into the avionics bay, creating a possible hazard to safe navigation.
We disagree with DAL's request because we have confirmed with Airbus and EASA that the clamp torque specified in the referenced service information is correct. Concerned operators may request approval of an AMOC for a lockwire solution under the provisions of paragraph (h) of this AD. We have not changed this AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule with the change described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the publicthan was already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Service Bulletin A350-38-P004, dated April 11, 2018. This service information describes procedures for replacing the affected potable water T-boxes and clamps with new parts. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 7 airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Up to 16 work-hours x $85 per hour = Up to $2,050........... Up to $3,410........... Up to $23,870.
$1,360. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected individuals. As a result, we have included all known costs in our cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
[[Page 56711]]
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.