Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to PW PW4074, PW4074D, PW4077, PW4077D, PW4084D, PW4090, and PW4090-3 turbofan engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on August 25, 2017 (82 FR 40514). The NPRM was prompted by the discovery of multiple cracked outer diffuser cases. The NPRM proposed to require initial and repetitive inspections to detect cracks in the outer diffuser case and removal from service of cases that fail inspection. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Change Compliance
PW requested that we change the effective date of the 1,000 cycle drawdown to ``within 1,000 flight cycles from March 31, 2017'', to coincide with PW Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) PW4G-112-A72-347, rather than ``within 1,000 flight cycles from the effective date of this AD''. PW stated that making the 1,000 cycle drawdown effective March 31, 2017, rather than the effective date of this AD, maintains the same level of risk.
We disagree with changing the effective date of the 1,000 cycle drawdown to ``within 1,000 flight cycles from March 31, 2017'', to coincide with PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347 because we cannot force mandatory action based on dates in the past. Mandatory action must be based on the effective date of this AD. In addition, we determined that basing the initial inspection and the inspection interval on the effective date of this AD maintains an acceptable level of safety. We did not change this AD.
Request To Add Credit for Previous Actions
PW and United Airlines (UAL) requested that we add Credit for Previous Actions to allow operators to take credit for inspections performed per PWASB PW4G-112-A72-347, dated March 31, 2017 prior to the effective date of this AD.
We disagree. Since use of PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347, dated March 31, 2017, is required in the compliance section of this AD, we do not need to reference this SB in the Credit for Previous Actions paragraph. Inspections performed per PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347 prior to the effective date of this AD meet the criteria of ``unless already done'' in the compliance section of this AD.
Request To Change Definitions
UAL requested that we define ``engine disassembly'' as ``when the M flange is split''. UAL reasoned that this would clarify the compliance requirements for operators and is consistent with PW ASB PW4G-112-A72- 347, dated March 31, 2017.
We agree. Defining ``engine disassembly'' clarifies compliance requirements for operators. We added a Definition paragraph to this AD.
Request To Change Compliance Time
UAL requested that we add a third option for the initial inspection so thatit could be performed prior to accumulating 13,000 cycles since new, or within 1,000 cycles from the effective date of this AD, or within 2,000 cycles since the last outer diffuser case piece-part fluorescent penetration inspection (FPI), whichever occurs later.
We partially agree. We agree with giving operator's credit for inspections done at piece-part exposure because if the outer diffuser case was inspected at piece-part exposure and passed inspection, it meets the initial inspection requirement mandated by this AD. We added a ``Credit for Previous Actions'' paragraph to this AD. Therefore, we disagree with adding the third option to the initial inspection compliance time specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
Request To Change Compliance
UAL requested that we identify the outer diffuser case piece-part level FPI done in accordance with PW Cleaning, Inspection and Repair (CIR) Manual 72-41-13, Inspection/Check-02, as an acceptable means of compliance for the repetitive inspections. UAL reasoned that when the outer diffuser case is at piece-part level, PW CIR Manual 72-41-13, Inspection/Check-02, is performed. The piece-part level FPI is equivalent to the high sensitivity module level inspection provided in PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347, dated March 31, 2017.
We agree. Inspections performed at piece-part exposure maintain an acceptable level of safety because the piece-part level FPI specified in PW CIR Manual Part Number 51A750, section 72-41-13, Inspection/ Check-02 is equivalent to the inspection mandated by this AD. Since we did not incorporate by reference a particular FPI process specification, a high sensitivity FPI using the methods, techniques, and practices equivalent to the current manufacturer's maintenance manual or Instructions for Continued Airworthiness satisfy both the initial and repetitive requirements of this AD. We did not change this AD.
Request To Change Service Information
PW requested that we change the service information reference from PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347, dated March 31, 2017, to PW ASB PW4G-112-A72- 347, Revision No. 1, dated October 26, 2017. PW stated that the SB has been revised to provide inspection clarifications requested by operators.
We disagree. We did not include PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347, Revision No. 1, dated October 26, 2017, since the risk analysis was based on the original ASB and we did not have the opportunity to give the public a chance to comment on this revision. We did not change this AD.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed PW ASB PW4G-112-A72-347, dated March 31, 2017. This PW ASB provides guidance on performing outer diffuser case FPIs. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
We reviewed PW4000 Series (112 Inch) Engine CIR Manual, Part Number 51A750, Revision Number 74, section
[[Page 2898]]
72-41-13, Inspection/Check-02, dated July 15, 2017. This manual section provides guidance on performing a high sensitivity FPI of the outer diffuser case at piece-part exposure.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 121 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tt3 boss inspection................... 3.5 work-hours x $85 per $0 $297.50 $35,997.50
hour = $297.50. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that would be required based on the results of the proposed inspection. We estimate six cases will need to be replaced in the domestic fleet.
On-Condition Costs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost perAction Labor cost Parts cost product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- FPI Inspection of outer diffuser case...... 10 work-hours x $85 per hour = $850 $0 $850 Replacement of outer diffuser case......... $0................................. 750,000 750,000 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.