Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Aerospace Welding Minneapolis, Inc. (AWI) mufflers, part numbers A1754001-23 and A1754001-25, installed on airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 18, 2017 (82 FR 18265). The NPRM was prompted by reports of broken or cracked welds in the connecting weld of the muffler body to muffler cuff. There have been 54 occurrences identified by maintenance and 2 occurrences identified by the carbon monoxide (CO) gas monitor warning system. The NPRM proposed to require an inspection of the muffler for leaking to identify cracks and replacement of the muffler. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response toeach comment.
Request To Expand the Applicability
An anonymous commenter requested we expand the applicability of the AD to include additional part number mufflers produced by the same manufacturer as the mufflers affected by this AD. The commenter thinks the additional part number mufflers may share some of the same materials, processes, and methods of assembly as the mufflers affected by this AD.
We do not agree with this comment. We addressed this concern during the investigation of the unsafe condition. We found that the unsafe condition is related to a design change and was applicable to one manufacturing lot. The unsafe condition applies to only the part numbers and serial numbers affected by this AD.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request To Prohibit the Installation of the Affected Muffler on Cessna 172R and 172S Airplanes
An anonymous commenter pointed out that that all 10 SDRs address the Models 172R and 172S airplanes. This commenter also asks how many of the 56 parts were installed on Cessna Models C172R and C172S airplanes. The commenter explains that (AWI) mufflers, part numbers A1754001-23 and A1754001-25, lack the reinforced ends and high temperature corrosion resistant material specified in FAR Part 23.1125(a)(1). The material substitution
[[Page 2355]]
makes it less resistant to high temperature and corrosion than the original type-certificated product. Based on the comments, the FAA infers that the commenter wants the AD to prohibit the installation of the affected parts, regardless of serial number, specifically on the Cessna Models 172R and 172S airplanes.
We do not agree with the implication that the installation prohibition should apply to all produced parts or only apply to the Cessna Model 172R and 172S airplanes. The unsafe condition resulted from a design change with a limited serial number effectivity and that is approved for installation on other models. We don't know how many parts are installed or could be installed in the future on the Cessna Models C172R and C172S airplanes. The current applicability captures all the potentially unsafe parts in the field. Concerns about material substitutions complying with 14 CFR 23.1125(a)(1) goes beyond the scope of this AD.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request We Add an Exhaust Systems Inspection
An anonymous commenter requested we issue an AD similar to a Transport Canada AD which requires an ongoing periodic pressure testing of the exhaust systems to help identify and reduce the risk of CO entering the cabin area.
We do not agree with this comment. This AD addresses the identified unsafe condition on the affected mufflers by requiring removal of the affected mufflers from airplanes. A more general pressure testing of exhaust systems is beyond the scope of this AD.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request To Make Spot Weld Procedures More Rigid
Ananonymous commenter requested we require parts manufacturer approval (PMA) spot weld procedures to be more rigid. The commenter stated that manually operated spot welding machines do not consistently control pressure, time, or frequency as required by weld schedules because the human operator controls those factors. It is almost impossible to meet the weld code without a computer aided machine.
We do not agree with this comment. Regulating how spot welds are done goes beyond the scope of this AD. This AD addresses the identified unsafe condition on the affected mufflers by requiring removal of the affected mufflers from airplanes.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request We Prohibit the Use of Less Heat Resistant Material
An anonymous commenter requested we not allow the substitution of less heat resistant material for higher heat resistant material. There are a number of FAA-approved PMA articles in existence certified by Identicality or Test and Computation where less heat resistant materials have been substituted. In many cases these PMA articles are used as terminating action to ADs and undermine the basis of the AD.
We do not agree with this comment. An applicant for a PMA must demonstrate compliance with the applicable regulations before the PMA is granted. This AD addresses the unsafe condition on the affected mufflers by requiring removal of the affected mufflers from airplanes. Changing the PMA process goes beyond the scope of this AD.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request We Make Related Documents Available
David McGhee requested we ensure documents related to the AD are readily available. Although requested several times by telephone and email, the commenter was unable to obtain a copy of related service information. This made review and comment on the proposed AD difficult.
We agree with this comment. Related documents should be available for a timely review of the AD. The NPRMincorrectly cited the related AWI service bulletin as AWI Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 16063001, dated June 30, 2015. The correct citation should read AWI Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 15063001, dated June 30, 2015. We confirmed the availability of the related service bulletin with the document provider and confirmed the commenter received a copy prior to the close of the comment period.
We changed this AD to use the correct citation based on this comment.
Request a Change to the Cost of Compliance
David McGhee requested we add the cost to determine if the affected muffler is installed on the airplane to the estimated cost of the AD. The related service information estimated it would take 1 hour of labor to inspect the airplane to determine if the affected muffler is installed.
We do not agree with this comment. The estimated cost of the AD applies specifically to addressing and correcting the unsafe condition. The FAA process for determining the cost of compliancedoes not include the initial determination of applicability. Also, for many airplanes, a review of the maintenance records will identify if the affected muffler is installed.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Request We Allow the Use of Other Service Information for Muffler Replacement
David McGhee requested we revise the AD to allow the use of other service information for installing a replacement muffler. Operators may choose to install an FAA-approved muffler from a source other than AWI. The service information proposed in the NPRM may not be appropriate for mufflers produced by a different manufacturer.
We agree with this comment. If an operator installs an FAA-approved muffler other than the AWI muffler, the installation instructions from that manufacturer should be used.
We have revised the language in this AD to allow the use of the manufacturer's installation instructions for the specific muffler that is being installed.
Request We Revise the Subject Heading
Thomas Nelson requested we revise the subject heading of the AD because it is not part of the company's name and implies the AD applies to all mufflers made by this company.
We partially agree with this comment. We agree the subject header could more clearly define the specific mufflers this AD applies to; however, we disagree with revising the subject header. The subject header is intended as a general header and is not intended to include details that address the specifics of applicability. The Office of the Federal Register develops the guidelines for the format and structure of rulemaking documents for all federal agencies to follow.
We have not changed this AD based on this comment.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this final rule with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
[[Page 2356]]
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed AWI Cessna 172 (Lycoming) Muffler Removal and Installation, Revision 01, January 17, 2017. The service information describes procedures for removing and replacing the affected mufflers. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
We reviewed AWI Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 15063001, dated June 30, 2015. The service bulletin describes how to identify the installation of an affected muffler.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 171 mufflers installed on airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspection of muffler............ 1 work-hour x $85 per Not applicable..... $85 $14,535
hour = $85. Replacement of the muffler....... 4 work-hours x $85 per $350............... 690 117,990
hour = $340. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This AD affects 171 mufflers withPMA; however, only 9 mufflers remain in service.
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost estimate.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety inair commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes, gliders, balloons, airships, domestic business jet transport airplanes, and associated appliances to the Director of the Policy and Innovation Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.