Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain IAE V2500-A1 turbofan engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on April 13, 2016 (81 FR 21768). The NPRM was prompted by a report of an uncontainment caused by a HPT seal release. The NPRM proposed to require removing from service the HPT No. 4 bearing front seal seat, P/ Ns 2A0066, 2A1998, and 2A3432, and the HPT No. 4 bearing rear seal seat, P/Ns 2A0067, 2A1999, and 2A3433, and replacement with parts eligible for installation. This AD would also require inspecting the HPT rotor and stator assembly, and, if necessary, their replacement with parts that are eligible for installation. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (81 FR 21768, April 13, 2016) and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Allow Monitoring of Oil Consumption and Monitoring Analysis
Air India Ltd. (AIL) commented that the fracture of the HPT stage 2 seal is a known problem with the type design. AIL does not agree that the root cause of the failure is clogged No. 4 bearing seal seats. AIL finds that increases in oil consumption and/or vibration signature are precursors to failure of the HPT stage 2 seal. We interpret AIL's comment as a request to allow monitoring of oil consumption rate and vibration signature analysis instead of the requirements of this AD.
We disagree. We disagree with AIL's analysis of the unsafe condition because although other failure modes leading to fracture of the HPT stage 2 seal exist, the uncontained part release noted in the NPRM (81 FR 21768, April 13, 2016) was caused by blockage of the No. 4 bearing seal seat's anti-weep circuit. We disagree with allowing oil consumption monitoring and vibration signature analysis because they do not provide an acceptable level of safety for engines with seal seats processed using methods susceptible to oil blockage. We did not change this AD.
Request To Delay Compliance
AIL commented that we should delay compliance to this AD until December 31, 2017. This additional time to comply with this AD would allow for minimal disruption to its fleet operations. AIL indicated that fleet safety would be maintained through engine oil consumption monitoring and vibration signature analysis.
We disagree. As noted in our previous comment response, oil consumption monitoring and vibration signature analysis do not provide an acceptable level of safety for engines with seal seats processed using methods susceptible to oil blockage. We did not change this AD.
[[Page 65266]]
Request To Revise Applicability
AIL commented that the applicability of this AD should not be limited to the IAE V2500-A1 fleet.
We disagree. The applicability of this AD is limited to the IAE V2500-A1 engines with affected serial numbers because this population of engines has been identified as having been processed using methods that could lead to failure of the HPT stage 2 seals. We did not change this AD.
Request To Include End Date for Compliance
IAE and Airbus commented that we should include an end date of December 31, 2016, for compliance with this AD.
We disagree. Our analysis of the unsafe condition determined that blockage of the No. 4 bearing seal seat anti-weep grooves is a function of engine cycles rather than time in service. We therefore did not base compliance on a calendar date. We did not change this AD.
Request To Require Oil Monitoring and Turbine Case Inspection
IAE and Airbus commented that not mandating oil monitoring and inspection of the turbine case weep-hole may increase risk to operators if they follow only the requirements of this AD. IAE indicated that this AD should match the compliance requirements of IAE SB V2500-ENG- 72-0670, dated March 14, 2016.
We disagree. We find that the actions required by this AD adequately address the unsafe condition represented by the possibility of failure of the HPT stage 2 seals while not imposing unnecessary burdens on operators. We did not change this AD.
Revision to Compliance
We revised the compliance section to allow installed No. 4 bearing front and rear seal seats to be returned to service following removal and refurbishment.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (81 FR 21768, April 13, 2016) for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (81 FR 21768, April 13, 2016).
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed IAE Non-Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) V2500-ENG- 72-0670, dated March 14, 2016. The NMSB identifies affected engines and provides guidance for replacing the No. 4 bearing front and rear seal seats and for inspecting the HPT rotor and stator assembly. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 0 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate that it will take about 10 hours to perform the seal seat replacement. The average labor rate is $85 per hour. We also estimate the cost of No. 4 bearing front and rear seal seats to be $13,562. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be $0.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on therelationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.