Discussion
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain B/E Aerospace protective breathing equipment (PBE) that is installed on airplanes. The SNPRM published in the Federal Register on January 15, 2016 (81 FR 2131). We preceded the SNPRM with a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2015 (80 FR 34330). The NPRM proposed to require inspecting the PBE to determine if the pouch has the proper vacuum seal and replacing if necessary. The NPRM was prompted by a report of a PBE catching fire upon activation by a crewmember. The SNPRM proposed to require replacement of the PBE following newly issued service information, regardless of inspection results. We are issuing this AD to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We have considered the comments received. We received one anonymous comment in support of the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016).
Request To Change Compliance Time
Penney Baudin of United Airlines requested a change to the PBE replacement compliance time.
The commenter requested a 12-month repetitive inspection with a 36- month terminating replacement action. The commenter stated that the change would alleviate restrictive shipping means and complex distribution of the PBEs since the units contain oxygen generators.
We do not agree with the commenter. We believe that the replacement compliance time of 18 months after the effective date of this AD is sufficient time since we are allowing even more time than specified in the related service information. Also, the public has been aware of this safety issue since we first published the first NPRM on June 16, 2015 (80 FR 34330). We have not changed the final rule AD action based on this comment.
Request To Correct ServiceInformation
John Barker of B/E Aerospace stated that Service Bulletin 119003- 35-009, dated November 9, 2015, is incorrectly referenced as Rev. 009 instead of Rev. 000 in the preamble of the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016). The commenter requested the reference to the revision number be corrected.
We agree with the commenter. However, on April 12, 2016, Rev. 001 of B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 119003-35-009 was released. We are incorporating the Revision 001, dated April 12, 2016, into the final rule AD action because the procedures for doing the inspection and replacement of the PBE have not changed.
We have changed the final rule AD action to include the newly revised service bulletin and to give credit to owners/operators who may have already done the required replacement following B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003-35-009, Rev. 000, dated November 9, 2015, which was correctly referenced in paragraph (h) of the regulatory text in the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016).
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016) for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the SNPRM (81 FR 2131, January 15, 2016).
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003-35-011, Rev. 000, dated February 4, 2015, and B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 119003- 35-009, Rev. 001, dated April 12, 2016. B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003-35-011, Rev. 000, dated
[[Page 37493]]
February 4, 2015, describes procedures for inspecting PBE, part number (P/N) 119003-11, to determine if the vacuum seal of the pouch containing the PBE is compromised. B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 119003-35-009, Rev. 001, dated April 12, 2016, describes procedures for replacing PBE P/N 119003-11 with P/N 119003-21. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Differences Between This AD and the Service Information
B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin No. 119003-35-011, Rev. 000, dated February 4, 2015, applies to all PBE with P/N 119003-11 and P/N 119003- 21. We have determined that this AD will apply only to a PBE P/N 119003-11 with regard to the inspection requirement of paragraph (g) of this AD. B/E Aerospace Service Bulletin 119003-35-009, Rev. 001, dated April 12, 2016, includes instructions for disposal. In this AD, we are requiring only the replacement action.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 9,000 products installed on airplanes ofU.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspecting the pouch containing .5 work-hour x $85 Not applicable......... $42.50 $382,500
the PBE for proper vacuum seal. per hour = $42.50. Replace the PBE P/N 119003-11 .5 work-hour x $85 1,510.................. 1,552.50 13,972,500
with a PBE P/N 119003-21. per hour = $42.50. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701: ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.