AD 2014-21-09

Active

Wings

Key Information
2014-21-09
Active
December 03, 2014
October 15, 2014
FAA-2014-0431
39-18003
Applicability
["Aircraft"]
["Large Airplane"]
The Boeing Company
727-100 Series 727-100C Series 727-200 Series 727-200F Series 727 Series 727C Series
Summary

We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005-14-07 for certain The Boeing Company Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes. AD 2005-14-07 required repetitive inspections of the carriage attach fittings on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of each wing for cracking and other discrepancies, and corrective actions if necessary. This new AD requires reducing certain repetitive inspection intervals for the inboard and outboard \n\n((Page 64307)) \n\ncarriage attach fittings for the outboard foreflaps, requires previously optional terminating actions which install improved outboard foreflap carriage attach fittings, and adds new initial and repetitive inspections of those fittings and corrective actions if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report of broken inboard and outboard carriage attach fittings of the outboard foreflaps found during an inspection. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the attach fittingsof the foreflap carriage of the wings, which could result in partial or complete loss of the foreflap and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane.

Action Required

Final rule.

Regulatory Text

Adoption of the Amendment \n\n\n\tAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\n\n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), and adding the following new AD: \n\n2014-21-09 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18003; Docket No. FAA- 2014-0431; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-041-AD. \n\n(a) Effective Date \n\n\n\tThis AD is effective December 3, 2014. \n\n(b) Affected ADs \n\n\n\tThis AD replaces AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005). \n\n(c) Applicability \n\n\n\tThis AD applies to Boeing Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002. \n\n((Page 64309)) \n\n(d) Subject \n\n\n\tAir Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings. \n\n(e) Unsafe Condition \n\n\n\tThis AD was prompted by a report of broken carriage attach fittings of the inboard and outboard foreflaps found during an inspection and an additional report of broken inboard and outboard carriage attach fittings of the outboard foreflaps found during an inspection. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the attach fittings of the foreflap carriage of the wings, which could result in partial or complete loss of the foreflap and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. \n\n(f) Compliance \n\n\n\tComply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. \n\n(g) Retained Inspections \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (f) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with revised service information and a new compliance time. Except as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD: Within 1,000 flight cycles after August 15, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-14-07) or within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles, except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD (for outboard foreflaps), inspect as specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. Accomplishing the actions of paragraph (m) or (o) of this AD terminates the inspections required by this paragraph for outboard foreflaps only. \n\t(1) A detailed inspection to detect cracks and surface deviations on all edges, surfaces, and lug attachmentfastener holes on the two carriage attach fittings on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of each wing. \n\t(2) A high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspection to detect cracks at the lug attachment fastener holes on the two carriage attach fittings on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of each wing. \n\n(h) Retained Replacement \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with revised service information. If any crack is detected or if any surface deviation beyond the limits specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012; is detected during any inspection required by paragraph (g) or (m) of this AD, before further flight, replace the carriage attach fitting with a new, improved fitting or a new fitting having the same part number as the existing fitting, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing AlertService Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. \n\n(i) Retained Measurement and Associated Corrective Action(s) \n\n\n\t(1) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with revised service information. Within 3,500 flight cycles after August 15, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-14-07), inspect for interference between the carriage attach fitting and the carriage lug fitting, and do other related investigative actions by accomplishing all the actions specified in paragraph 3.C. and Figure 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or paragraph 3.B.3 and Figure 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. Do the actions in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. \n\t(2) Paragraphs (i)(2)(i) and (i)(2)(ii) of this AD restate the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with revised service information. \n\t(i) If any discrepancy is found during any action required by paragraph (i)(1) of this AD, before further flight, accomplish applicable corrective action(s) (e.g., adding a shim or reworking the carriage attachment lug assembly), in accordance with paragraph 3.C. and Figure 2 or 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or paragraph 3.B.3. and Figure 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012; except as required by paragraph (i)(2)(ii) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, use only Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. \n\t(ii) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; or Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012; specify to contact the manufacturer if rework of the improved fitting is required: Before further flight, rework in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), or Los Angeles ACO, FAA; or in accordance with data meeting the type certification basis of the airplane approved by an Authorized Representative (AR) for the Boeing Delegation Option Authorization (DOA) Organization who has been authorized by the FAA to make such findings; or using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s) of this AD. For a repair method to be approved, the repairmust meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically reference this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, any new repair approval must be done using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s) of this AD. \n\n(j) Retained Concurrent Requirements \n\n\n\t(1) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with new paragraph reference. For Model 727 airplanes listed in Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-59, Revision 1, dated September 27, 1965: Before or at the same time with the requirements of paragraph (i) or (o) of this AD, install guide blocks and bushings in the midflap ribs in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-59, Revision 1, dated September 27, 1965. \n\t(2) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with new paragraph reference. For Model 727 airplanes listed in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972: Before or at the same time with the requirements of paragraph (i) or (o) of this AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i) and (j)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable. \n\t(i) For Groups I and II airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972: Do a one-time inspection of the airload support roller for travel on the foreflap track, in accordance with Part I of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972. \n\t(A) If the airload support roller travels within the limits specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972, modify the control drum of the inboard flap and inboard jackscrews of the outboard flap, in accordance with Part II of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972.(B) If the airload support roller travels beyond the limits specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, or Los Angeles ACO, FAA; or in accordance with data meeting the type certification basis of the airplane approved by an AR for the Boeing DOA Organization who has been authorized by the FAA to make such findings; or using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s) of this AD. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically reference this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, any new repair approval must be done using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s) of this AD. \n\t(ii) For Group III airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972: Modify the inboard jackscrews of the outboard flap (i.e., replacing the down stop at the inboard jackscrews of the outboard flap) in accordance with Part II of the \n\n((Page 64310)) \n\nAccomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972. \n\t(3) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with new paragraph reference. For Model 727 airplanes listed in Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966: Before or at the same time with the requirements of paragraph (i) or (o) of this AD, do the actions specified in paragraphs (j)(3)(i) through (j)(3)(iv) of this AD. \n\t(i) Chamfer the upper and lower flanges at the aft end of the foreflap tracks in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. \n\t(ii) Do a standard magnetic particle inspection of the entire foreflap tracks for cracks in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. If any crack is detected, before further flight, repair in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO, or Los Angeles ACO, FAA; or in accordance with data meeting the type certification basis of the airplane approved by an AR for the Boeing DOA Organization who has been authorized by the FAA to make such findings; or using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s) of this AD. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically reference this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, any new repair approval must be done using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (s) of this AD. \n\t(iii) Do a general visual inspection of the track rib faces at the front and rear spars to verify if the opening in the spars is flush with or clear of the plane of the rib faces, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. If the opening is not flush or clear with the plane, before further flight, rework the spar opening in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. \n\t(iv) Do a general visual inspection of the head or shank of bolts by securing the foreflap links to the foreflap tracks to verify if they protrude beyond the edge of the track flange in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. If the head or shank of the bolts protrude beyond the edge of the track flange, before further flight, rework in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. \n\t(v) For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is defined as: ''A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked.'' \n\t(4) This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (m) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with a new paragraph identifier. For airplanes other than those identified in the service information specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(3) of this AD: Before or at the same time with the requirements of paragraph (i) or (o) of this AD, do an inspection to verify if any of the parts listed in the ''Spares Affected'' paragraph of each service information referenced in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(3) of this AD are installed on the airplane. If any part identified in that paragraph is found installed, before further flight, do the applicable corrective and investigative action(s) specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(3) of this AD. \n\n(k) Retained Optional Terminating Actions \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (n) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with no changes. Replacement of the two carriage attach fittings on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of each wing with new, improved fittings, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; and accomplishment of the actions specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(4) of this AD, as applicable, before or concurrently with the replacement; constitutes terminating action for paragraphs(g) through (j) of this AD and paragraph (l) of this AD for those replaced fittings on the outboard and inboard foreflaps. \n\n(l) Retained Optional Deferral of Inspection \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the optional deferral of paragraph (o) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with no changes. Replacement of the two carriage attach fittings on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of each wing with new fittings having the same part number as the existing fittings, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002; and accomplishment of the actions specified in paragraphs (j)(1) through (j)(4) of this AD, as applicable, before or concurrently with the replacement; defers the next inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD for 10,000 flight cycles after the replacement. Thereafter, repeat the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles, except as required by paragraph (m) of this AD. \n\n(m) New Detailed and HFEC Inspections of Outboard Foreflaps, With Reduced Repetitive Intervals \n\n\n\tWithin 1,000 flight cycles after the most recent accomplishment of the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD, do a detailed inspection to detect cracks and surface deviations on all edges, surfaces, and lug attachment fastener holes, and a HFEC inspection to detect cracks at the lug attachment fastener holes, on the two carriage attach fittings on the outboard foreflaps of each wing, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012, and do all applicable corrective actions required by paragraph (h) of this AD. Repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed 200 flight cycles until the requirements of paragraph (o) of this AD is accomplished. Accomplishing the requirements of this paragraph terminates the requirementsof paragraph (g) of this AD for the outboard foreflaps only. \n\n(n) New Inspection and Check of Outboard Foreflap Installation and Corrective Action \n\n\n\tWithin 200 flight cycles or 6 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, do a general visual inspection and function check for damage and incorrect operation of the outboard foreflap installations, and all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. Do the applicable corrective actions before further flight. Thereafter, repeat the inspection and check at intervals not to exceed 500 flight cycles. \n\n(o) New Replacement of Previously Un-Replaced (or ''Original Configuration'') Carriage Attach Fittings on the Outboard Foreflap \n\n\n\tFor airplanes on which any production carriage attach fitting is still installed on the outboard foreflap: Within 3,000 flight cycles or 3 years after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, replace all production carriage attach fittings with new, improved carriage attach fittings, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727- 57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012, and do all applicable concurrent actions required by paragraph (k) of this AD. Accomplishing the requirements of this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraphs (g) and (m) of this AD for outboard foreflaps only. \n\n(p) New Inspection, Corrective Action and Replacement of Fittings Replaced in Accordance With Paragraph (l) of This AD \n\n\n\tFor airplanes on which a new carriage attach fitting with the original part number on the outboard foreflap was installed in accordance with paragraph (l) of this AD: Do the actions specified in paragraphs (p)(1) and (p)(2) of this AD. \n\t(1) Within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, do a detailed inspection for cracks and surface deviation on all edges surfaces, and lug attachment fastener holes, and a HFEC inspection for cracks at the lug attachment fastener holes, on the carriage attach fittings for the outboard foreflaps, and do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. Repeat the inspection at intervals not to exceed 200 \n\n((Page 64311)) \n\nflight cycles. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. \n\t(2) Within 3,000 flight cycles or 3 years after the effective date of this AD, replace the fitting with a new, improved fitting in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. Accomplishing the requirements of this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraphs (g), (m), and (p)(1) of this AD for that outboard foreflap only. \n\n(q) New Inspection and Corrective Actions on Fittings Replaced According to Paragraph (k), (o), or (p) of This AD on Outboard Foreflaps \n\n\n\tFor airplanes on which a new, improved carriage attach fitting on the outboard foreflap was replaced in accordance with the requirements of paragraph (k), (o), or (p) of this AD: Within 20,000 flight cycles after installing that fitting, do a detailed inspection for cracks and surface deviation on all edges surfaces, and lug attachment fastener holes, and a HFEC inspection for cracks at the lug attachment fastener holes, on the carriage attach fittings for the outboard foreflaps, and do all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,400 flight cycles. Accomplishing the requirements of this paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD for outboard foreflaps only. \n\n(r) Retained Credit for Previously Accomplished Service Bulletins \n\n\n\t(1) This paragraph restates the credit provided by paragraph (p) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with no changes. Installations accomplished before August 15, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-14-07), in accordance with Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-59, dated September 2, 1965, are acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. \n\t(2) This paragraph restates the credit provided by paragraph (q) of AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), with no changes. Inspections and modifications accomplished before August 15, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-14-07), in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, dated October 7, 1971, are acceptable for compliance with the requirements of paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. \n\n(s) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) \n\n\n\t(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (t)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-LAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. \n\t(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. \n\t(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. \n\t(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of this AD. \n\n(t) Related Information \n\n\n\t(1) For more information about this AD, contact Chandraduth Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-5239; fax: 562-627-5210; email chandraduth.ramdoss@faa.gov. \n\t(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs (u)(5) and (u)(6) of this AD. \n\n(u) Material Incorporated by Reference \n\n\n\t(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C.552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. \n\t(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. \n\t(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on December 3, 2014. \n\t(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 4, dated September 26, 2012. \n\t(ii) Reserved. \n\t(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on August 15, 2005 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005). \n\t(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 727-57A0135, Revision 3, dated June 27, 2002. \n\t(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 727-27-133, Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972. Pages 1, 12, 14 through 18, and 27 of this document are identified as Revision 1, dated May 9, 1972. Pages 2 through 11, 13, 19 through 26, and 28 are original, dated October 7, 1971. \n\t(iii) Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-59, Revision 1, dated September 27, 1965. Pages 1, 4, and 6 of this document are identified as Revision 1, dated September 27, 1965. Pages 2, 3, and 5 are original, dated September 2, 1965. \n\t(iv) Boeing 727 Service Bulletin 57-72, dated September 21, 1966. \n\t(5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544- 5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. \n\t(6) You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport Aircraft Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. \n\t(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Supplementary Information

Discussion \n\n\n\tWe issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2005-14-07, Amendment 39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, 2005). AD 2005-14-07 applied to certain The Boeing Company Model 727, 727C, 727-100, 727-100C, 727-200, and 727-200F series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 9, 2014 (79 FR 38801). The NPRM was prompted by a report of broken inboard and outboard carriage attach fittings of the outboard foreflaps found during an inspection required by AD 2005-14-07. The airplane had 47,125 flight cycles. Boeing stated that the metallurgical analysis determined that the cause of the broken fittings is a suspected static overload condition. The NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive inspections of the carriage attach fittings on the inboard and outboard foreflaps of each wing for cracking and other discrepancies, and corrective actions if necessary. The NPRM also proposed to require reducing certain repetitive inspection intervals for the inboard and outboard carriage attach fittings for the outboard foreflaps, requiring previously optional terminating actions which install improved outboard foreflap carriage attach fittings, and adding new initial and repetitive inspections of those fittings and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the attach fittings of the foreflap carriage of the wings, which could result in partial or complete loss of the foreflap and consequent loss of controllability of the airplane. \n\nComments \n\n\n\tWe gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We have considered the comment received. Boeing supported the NPRM (79 FR 38801, July 9, 2014). \n\nConclusion \n\n\n\tWe reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: \n\tAre consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 38801, July 9, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and \n\tDo not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 38801, July 9, 2014). \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tWe estimate that this AD affects 98 airplanes of U.S. registry. \n\tWe estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: \n\n\n\tRetained Estimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost on U.S. \n\tRetained action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspections of the carriage 4 work-hours x $85 None.............. $340 per airplane, $33,320, per \n\tattach fittings for all per hour = $340.per inspection inspection cycle. \n\tairplanes (retained actions cycle. \n\tfrom AD 2005-14-07, Amendment \n\t39(dash)14184 (70 FR 39647, \n\tJuly 11, 2005)). Installation of guide blocks for 32 work-hours x $0................ $2,720 per Up to $266,560. \n\tcertain airplanes (retained $85 per hour = airplane. \n\tactions from AD 2005-14-07, $2,720. \n\tAmendment 39-14184 (70 FR \n\t39647, July 11, 2005)). Inspection of foreflap airload 4 work-hours x $85 None.............. $340 per airplane. Up to $33,320. \n\troller travel for certain per hour = $340. \n\tairplanes (retained actions \n\tfrom AD 2005-14-07, Amendment \n\t39-14184 (70 FR 39647, July 11, \n\t2005)). \n\n((Page 64308)) \n\n\n\nModification of the inboard 4 work-hours x $85 $0................ $340 per airplane. Up to $33,320. \n\tjackscrews on the outboard flap per hour = $340. \n\tfor certain airplanes (retained \n\tactions from AD 2005-14-07, \n\tAmendment 39-14184 (70 FR \n\t39647, July 11, 2005)). Inspection of the entire track 12 work-hours x None.............. $1,020 per Up to $99,960. \n\tand of the track rib faces for $85 per hour = airplane. \n\tcertain airplanes (retained $1,020. \n\tactions from AD 2005-14-07, \n\tAmendment 39-14184 (70 FR \n\t39647, July 11, 2005)). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\n\n\tEstimated Costs for New Actions ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost on U.S. \n\tRetained action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Inspection and functional check 3 work-hours x $85 None.............. $255, per $24,990, per \n\tof outboard foreflap per hour = $255 inspection cycle. inspection cycle. \n\tinstallation for all airplanes per inspection \n\t(new action). cycle. Replacement of carriage attach 2 work-hours x $85 $18,000........... $18,170 per Up to $1,780,660. \n\tfitting on outboard foreflap per hour = $170. airplane. \n\tfor certain airplanes (new \n\taction). ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\tWe estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that would be required based on the results of the inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that might need these replacements: \n\n\n\tOn-Condition Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tActionLabor cost Parts cost Cost per product ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Replacement of sequence carriage 2 work-hours x $85 per Up to $175............. Up to $345. \n\tslider or sidewall rubstrips. hour = $170. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ''General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, \n\t(2) Is not a ''significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), \n\t(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and \n\t(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

AD Assistant

Get AI-powered answers about this AD, check applicability, and find compliance steps.

Sign Up to Unlock
Related ADs
2005-14-07 This AD replaces the above
Contact Information

Chandraduth Ramdoss, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120L, FAA, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712- 4137; phone: 562-627-5239; fax: 562-627-5210; email chandraduth.ramdoss@faa.gov.

References
(Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014))
--- - Part 39
(Pages 64306-64311)
FAA Documents
ADs Superseded by This AD
AD Number Subject Effective Date Actions
2005-14-07 Carriage attach fittings on the foreflaps 2005-08-15 View