Discussion
On July 13, 2011, we issued AD 2011-15-10, Amendment 39-16757 (76 FR 45655, August 1, 2011), for Superior Air Parts and Lycoming Engines fuel-injected reciprocating engines. That AD requires, before further flight, removing AFS fuel servos installed after May 20, 2010, if the servo contained an AFS diaphragm, P/N AV2541801 or P/N AV2541803, from certain production lots. That AD resulted from an accident involving a Piper PA32R-301 airplane. We issued that AD to prevent an in-flight engine shutdown due to a failed fuel servo diaphragm, and damage to the airplane.
Actions Since AD Was Issued
Since we issued AD 2011-15-10, Amendment 39-16757 (76 FR 45655, August 1, 2011), five commenters made us aware of eight additional engine models affected by the unsafe condition. We concur with the commenters. Discussions with AFS as a result of the comments indicated that the diaphragm problem extended to other reciprocating engines. AFS also indicated that the problem diaphragms could be installed on other unknown fuel injected engines. Therefore, we determined that we need to change the applicability from a table of specific engine models, to all Superior Air Parts, Lycoming Engines, and Continental Motors, Inc., fuel injected reciprocating engine models with an AFS fuel servo diaphragm, P/N AV2541801 or P/N AV2541803, installed.
Also since we issued AD 2011-15-10, Amendment 39-16757 (76 FR 45655, August 1, 2011), we relaxed the compliance from before further flight to within 5 flight hours after the effective date of the AD.
Relevant Service Information
We reviewed AFS Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. AFS-SB6, Revision 2, dated April 6, 2011. The MSB provides P/Ns and serial numbers (S/Ns) of affected servos.
FAA's Determination
We conducted an updated risk analysis using the known number of diaphragms potentially still in service and concluded that an unacceptable risk of an in-flight engine shutdown still exists. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
AD Requirements
This AD requires within 5 flight hours after the effective date of this AD, that you determine if an AFS fuel servo diaphragm P/N AV2541801 or P/N AV2541803 from specific production lots, as identified in AFS MSB No. AFS-SB6, Revision 2, dated April 6, 2011, was installed in your fuel servo at any time after May 20, 2010, and if installed, that you remove the fuel servo from service before further flight.
This AD also replaces Table 1 of the existing AD with the statement that this AD applies to all Superior Air Parts, Lycoming Engines, and Continental Motors, Inc., fuel injected reciprocating engine models with an AFS fuel servo diaphragm, P/N AV2541801 or P/N AV2541803, installed.
Differences Between the AD and the Service Information
AFS MSB No. AFS-SB6, Revision 2, dated April 6, 2011, does not specify a compliance time and recommends limiting special flight permits to delivery to a service location. This AD requires performing the actions within 5 flight hours and prohibits special flight permits.
FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because of the compliance requirement of 5 flight hours. Therefore, we find that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and we did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to provide your comments before it becomes effective. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2011-0547 and directorate identifier 2011-NE-13- AD at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 61,000 engines installed on aircraft of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 0.5 work-hour per engine to perform the inspection, 2.0 work-hours per engine to remove the servo from 261 engines with a discrepant AFS diaphragm, P/N AV2541801 or P/N AV2541803 installed, and that the average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. We estimate the parts cost to be $565 per servo. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be $2,784,335.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
[[Page 6673]]
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.