Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA AD 2009-0024, dated February 20, 2009, to correct an unsafe condition for the Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopters.
The MCAI AD states there have been a "few'' reports of cracks and failure of the MRH cone restrainer support lugs in the area of their attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome fairing is secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been reported. Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing support attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage to the rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter or injury to persons on the ground.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI AD and any related service information in the AD docket.
Related Service Information
Eurocopter has issued one Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB) No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3, 2009 (EASB No. 05A003) for two different helicopters: the Model EC225LP and the military Model EC725AP, a non-FAA type certificated helicopter. Eurocopter has also issued EASB No. 62-007, dated July 10, 2009 (SB 62-007), which corresponds to MOD 0743718. EASB 05A003 specifies checking the MRH in the area of the cone restrainer support attachment lugs and the dome fairing support attachment lugs for a crack. If a crack is found in one of the five lugs of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing support, the EASB specifies complying with SB 62-007 before further flight. SB 62-007 specifies modifying the MRH by replacing the cone restrainer support and the dome fairing support, reidentifying those parts and balancing the main rotor blades if they were removed. The actions described in the MCAI AD are intended to correct the unsafe condition identified in the service information.
FAA's Evaluation and Unsafe Condition Determination
This helicopter has been approved by the aviation authority of France and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, their Technical Agent, has notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI AD. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of this same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI AD
We do not specify dates because the dates have already passed nor do we specify the compliance time in days but rather only in hours time-in-service (TIS). We also use a different compliance time. Also, we use inspect rather than check when referring to an action required by a mechanic as opposed to a pilot.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect about 4 helicopters of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 30 work-hours per helicopter toinspect and modify the MRH. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $18,981 per helicopter. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators will be $86,124, assuming a crack is found in each MRH cone restrainer support or dome fairing support attachment lugs.
FAA's Determination of the Effective Date
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of this AD. We find that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because of the short compliance time of 15 hours TIS to conduct the inspection for a crack in the attachment lugs. Failure of these lugs could result in loss of control of the helicopter. Therefore, we have determined that notice and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer than 30 days.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public comment. However, we invite you to send us any written data, views, or arguments concerning this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under the ADDRESSES section of this AD. Include "Docket No. FAA-2010- 0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-56-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we receive about this AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in "Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on product(s) identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Therefore, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new Airworthiness Directive (AD):