This amendment adopts a new AD for certain serial-numbered Bell Model 205B and 212 helicopters with a M/R blade, part number (P/N) 212-015-501-005, -111, -113, -115, -117, -119, or - 121, installed. The AD requires, within 25
hours time-in-service (TIS), and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS, washing the upper and lower surfaces of each M/R blade and visually inspecting the grip plates and doublers in the area between blade stations 24.5 and 40.0 for an edge void, corrosion, or a crack, using a 3x power or higher magnifying glass. It also requires visually inspecting the remaining surfaces of each M/R blade in the area between blade stations 24.5 and 40.0 for any corrosion or a crack using a 3x power or higher magnifying glass. If a crack is found in the paint finish, removing the paint and re-inspecting the M/R blade is required before further flight. If a crack is found in the M/R blade, replacing it with an airworthy M/R blade is required before further flight. If an edge void or any corrosion is found in the M/R blade, replacing it with an airworthy M/R blade, or repairing it if the damage is within the maximum repair damage limits, is required before further flight. This amendment is prompted by two reports of fatigue cracks on M/R blades installed on Model 212 helicopters. The cracks were located in the lower doublers and skin, and the box beam at the M/R blade attachment bolt hole, and in the lower grip plate at blade station (BS) 36. The M/R blades had accumulated 1,026 and 2,559 hours TIS. The cause of the cracks has been attributed to inadequate adhesive bonding during manufacture in the area between the grip plate and mating doubler surface. A crack first appears in the grip plate, which can be detected visually with the M/R blade installed on the helicopter. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect an edge void, corrosion, or a crack on a M/R blade, which could lead to loss of the M/R blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.
We have reviewed Bell Helicopter Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 205B-08-51 and ASB No. 212-08-130, both Revision A, dated January 13, 2009, applicable to Model 205B and Model 212 helicopters, respectively, which describe procedures for initial and repetitive inspections of certain part-numbered M/R blades on certain serial-numbered helicopters for signs of an edge void, corrosion, or a crack, including a hair-line crack in the M/R blade paint finish.
This unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design. Therefore, this AD is being issued to detect an edge void, corrosion, or a crack on a M/R blade, which could lead to loss of the M/R blade and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Accomplish the actions by following specified portions of the applicable ASB, described previously. The short compliance time involved is required because the previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the structural integrity and controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, the AD must be issued immediately to require the following actions within 25 hours TIS, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 100 hours TIS:
Washing the upper and lower M/R blade surfaces using a solution of cleaning compound (C-318) and water;
Using a 3x or higher magnifying glass, visually inspecting the upper and lower grip plates and doublers of the M/R blade between blade station (BS) 24.5 to 40, and the whole width of the chord, for an edge void, any corrosion, or a crack;
Using a 3x power or higher magnifying glass, visually inspecting the remaining upper and lower surfaces of the M/R blade between BS 24.5 and 40.0, and the whole width of the chord, for any corrosion or a crack;
Applying a light coat of preservative oil (C-125) to all surfaces of the M/R blade;
Removing paint from areas in which a crack is discovered in the M/R blade paint finish by sanding with180-220 grit paper to determine if a crack exists in the M/R blade;
Replacing any M/R blade that has a crack in any part of the M/R blade other than the paint finish with an airworthy M/R blade;
Replacing any M/R blade that has any corrosion or an edge void with an airworthy M/R blade, or repairing the M/R blade if the damage is within the maximum repair damage limits. The maximum repair damage limitations are contained in the applicable Component and Repair Overhaul Manual; and
Replacing any M/R blade that has any parent material removed during the sanding operation to remove paint from areas in which a paint crack is discovered, or repairing the M/R blade if the amount of parent removed material is within the maximum repair damage limits.
Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effectivein less than 30 days.
We estimate that this AD will affect 87 helicopters of U.S. registry, and washing and visually inspecting each M/R blade will take approximately 1 work hour per helicopter at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. If an edge void, corrosion, or a crack is discovered, replacing the M/R blade with an airworthy blade will take approximately 6 work hours. Required parts will cost approximately $97,500 for a replacement M/R blade. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators to be $139,740, assuming that 6 inspections per year are conducted on each helicopter, and that one M/R blade will need to be replaced.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include "Docket No. FAA-2010-0065; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-01-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, "General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFRpart 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive to read as follows: