Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR Part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 4, 2008 (73 FR 45178). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
It has been found the occurrence of failed bearings of the RAT [ram air turbine] generator, which may lead to a RAT generator failure. The RAT generator was designed to provide emergency electrical power to essential systems in case of loss of all other sources of aircraft AC electrical power.
Loss of emergency electrical power could result in reduced controllability of the airplane during in-flight emergencies. The corrective actions include determining the part number and serial number of the RAT, and re-identifying or replacing the RAT if necessary. You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We considered the comments received from a single commenter.
Request To Change Applicability
Embraer suggests restricting the applicability specified in paragraph (c) of the NPRM to the affected airplanes "equipped with a RAT having part number (P/N) 1703781.'' Embraer did not provide a reason for the request.
We do not agree to restrict the applicability as suggested by Embraer. The applicability specified in this AD includes all EMBRAER Model ERJ 170 and ERJ 190 airplanes, because the first action is to determine the part number and serial number of the RAT. Therefore, it is not necessary to restrict the applicability by identifying the part number of the RAT. We have made no change to the AD in this regard.
Request To Clarify RAT Part Number
Embraer asks that we change the replacement part specification in paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of the NPRM from "a RAT having P/N 1703781A''to "a RAT not having P/N 1703781.'' Embraer states that not restricting P/N 1703781A as the only allowable replacement part number will avoid issuing alternative methods of compliance if a new RAT part number is approved in the future.
We agree with the intent of the request to change the replacement part number specification in paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD. We have determined that the replacement part should not be restricted to P/N 1703781A only; therefore, we have removed that part number and specified replacing the affected RAT with a serviceable RAT. We have changed paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD accordingly.
Request To Add Spares Paragraph
Embraer suggests a new paragraph be added to the AD to cover possible spare RATs in stock. Embraer states that, as currently written, airplanes that do not have the affected part installed would be in compliance with the AD. However, the affected part could be installed during performance of airplane maintenance.
We do not agree that a spares paragraph should be added to the AD. In this AD we require that affected parts be replaced with serviceable parts having a new part number. This new part number is also specified in the Aircraft Illustrated Parts Catalog as replacing the old part number; therefore a spares paragraph is not necessary. We have made no change to the AD in this regard.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously. We also determined that this change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have required different actions in this AD from those in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences are highlighted in a Note within the AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 124 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the U.S. operators to be $9,920, or $80 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. "Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in "Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
List of Subjectsin 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD: