On June 16, 2004, the FAA issued AD 2001-24- 07 R1, Amendment 39-13687 (69 FR 35511, June 25, 2004). That AD required inspecting each MRB, part number (P/N) 709-0103-01, tip cap, for either bonding separation or a crack, and provided a terminating action for the requirements of the AD by replacing each tip cap with an airworthy tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109. \n\n\tSince issuing that AD, there has been one report of in-flight loss of part of a tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, resulting in an emergency landing due to an increase in vibrations. There has also been one report of cracking on the tip cap leading edge. Therefore, on December 20, 2007, we issued Emergency AD 2007-26-52, which superseded AD 2001- 24-07 R1 (69 FR 35511, June 25, 2004), to remove the terminating action of replacing a tip cap with tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, and to remove the serial number limitation of AD 2001-24-07 R1. The Emergency AD requires inspecting and replacing certain MRBs, if necessary. \n\n\tThe European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical Agent for Italy, a Member State of the European Community, notified us that an unsafe condition may exist on Agusta Model A109C, A109E, and A109K2 helicopters. The EASA advises that an incident occurred in which a Model A109E helicopter lost part of the tip of the MRB due to fracture of the welded bead (joint line of shells). The manufacturer advises that the investigation relating to this tip cap failure is still ongoing. \n\n\tAgusta has issued Alert Bollettino Tecnico No. 109-106 for the Model A109C, No. 109K-22 for the Model A109K2, and No. 109EP-1 for the Model A109E, all Revision B and all dated December 19, 2000, which describe inspecting the MRB tip cap for bonding separation and a crack; a tap inspection of the tip cap for bonding separation in the blade bond; and a dye-penetrant inspection of the tip cap leading edge along the welded joint line of the upper and lower tip cap skin shells for a crack. Since then, Agusta has issued Bollettino Tecnico No. 109-125 for the Model A109C, No. 109EP-85 for the Model A109E, and No. 109K-48 for the Model A109K2, all dated December 13, 2007, which describe procedures for inspecting the tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, for cracks and for damage on the tip cap leading edge at the welded bead (joint line of shells). The EASA classified these bollettino tecnicos as mandatory and issued EASA Emergency AD No. 2007-0306-E, dated December 14, 2007, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these helicopters in Italy. \n\n\tThese helicopter models are manufactured in Italy and are type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.29 and the applicable bilateral agreement. Pursuant to the applicable bilateral agreement, the EASA, the agent for Italy, has kept the FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the EASA, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of these type designs that are certificated for operation in the United States. \n\n\tSince the unsafe condition described is likely to exist or develop on other Agusta Model A109C, A109E, and A109K2 helicopters of the same type designs, the FAA issued Emergency AD 2007-26-52 to prevent an increase in vibration of the MRB and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. The AD requires, for any MRB with a serial number with a prefix of either "EM-'' or "A5-'', except a MRB with a tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, within 10 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 25 hours time-in-service (TIS): \n\n\tA tap inspection of the upper and lower sides of each tip cap for bonding separation and in the tip cap to blade bond area; \n\n\tA visual inspection of the upper and lower side of each blade tip cap for swelling or deformation; and \n\n\tA dye-penetrant inspection of the tip cap leading edge along the welded joint line of the upper and lower tip cap skin shells for a crack. The AD also requires visually inspecting each MRB with a tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, for a crack on the leading edge at the welded bead (joint line of shells) using a 10x or higher power magnifying glass, and if there is damage other than a crack, inspecting the area using a dye-penetrant inspection method, within the following compliance times: \n\n\tFor a tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, with 600 or more hours TIS, inspect within the next 5 hours TIS or 30 days, whichever occurs first, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS; or \n\n\tFor a tip cap with less than 600 hours TIS, inspect before reaching 600 hours TIS, and thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 50 hours TIS. \n\tIf dwelling, deformation, a crack, or bonding separation that exceeds the prescribed limits is found in a MRB with an affected prefix, except a MRB with a tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, the MRB must be replaced with an airworthy MRB before further flight. If a crack is found in a MRBwith tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, then before further flight the MRB must be replaced with an airworthy MRB. The actions must be accomplished in accordance with the bollettino tecnicos described previously. \n\n\tThe short compliance time involved is required because the previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the structural integrity and controllability of the helicopter. Therefore, the applicable inspections of each affected MRB and replacing any unairworthy MRB are required before further flight, and this AD must be issued immediately. \n\n\tSince it was found that immediate corrective action was required, notice and opportunity for prior public comment thereon were impracticable and contrary to the public interest, and good cause existed to make the AD effective immediately by individual letters issued on December 20, 2007 to all known U.S. owners and operators of Model A109C, A109E, and A109K2 helicopters. These conditions still exist, and the AD is hereby published in the Federal Register as an amendment to 14 CFR 39.13 to make it effective to all persons. \n\n\tThe FAA estimates that this AD will affect 101 helicopters of U.S. registry (44 without a tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, plus 57 with that tip cap), and will take, for MRBs with any tip cap, except tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, approximately 6 work hours per helicopter to accomplish the initial and 24 25-hour TIS repetitive inspections (assuming they include dye-penetrant inspections), and for MRBs with tip cap, P/N 709-0103-29-109, installed, approximately 8 work hours per helicopter to accomplish the initial and 12 50-hour TIS repetitive inspections, assuming that these inspections require using a dye- penetrant method also, at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators to be $495,360. \n\nComments Invited \n\n\tThis AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect flight safety andwas not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include "Docket No. FAA-2008-0524; Directorate Identifier 2007-SW-77-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light of those comments. \n\tWe will post all comments we receive, without change, to http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You may review the DOT's complete PrivacyAct Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit http://docketsinfo.dot.gov. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\tWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation: \n\t1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; \n\t2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and \n\t3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\tWe prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with thisAD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, "General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition \nthat is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\nAccordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive to read as follows: