Discussion
On November 15, 2006, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to certain EXTRA Flugzeugproduktions-und Vertriebs-GmbH (EXTRA) Models EA-300, EA-300S, EA-300L, and EA-300/200 airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on November 22, 2006 (71 FR 67499). The NPRM proposed to supersede AD 2002-21-11, Amendment 39-12917 (67 FR 65479, October 25, 2002), with a new AD that would require you to do the following:
Inspect the upper longeron at the horizontal stabilizer attachment for cracks;
Reinforce the upper longeron in the area of the horizontal stabilizer attachment; and
Install V-tubes to reinforce fuselage frame underneath the horizontal stabilizer attachment bracket on Models EA-300S and EA-300L airplanes only.
Comments
We provided the public the opportunity to participatein developing this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Conclusion
We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these minor corrections:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.
Differences Between the European Authority AD, the Service Bulletin, and This AD
EASA AD No. 2006-0281, dated September 14, 2006, and EXTRA Service Bulletin No. 300-2-95, Issue: F, Dated: July 10, 2006, allow 50-hour repetitive inspections of the horizontal stabilizer attachment with the option of installing the modification kits as a terminating action for the repetitive inspections for certain affected airplanes. This AD does not allow continued repetitive inspections.
The FAA has determined that long-term continued operational safety is better assured by design changes that remove the source of the problem rather than by repetitive inspections or other special procedures.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 134 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to do the inspection:
Labor Cost
Parts Cost
Total Cost Per Airplane
Total Cost on U.S. Operators
24 work-hours X $80 per hour = $1,920
Not applicable
$1,920
$1,920 X 134 = $257,280
We estimate the following costs to do the modifications:
Labor Cost
Parts Cost
Total Cost Per Airplane
Total Cost on U.S. Operators
40 work-hours X $80 per hour = $3,200
$200
$3,200 + $200 = $3,400
$3,400 X 134 = $455,600
For airplanes still covered under warranty, the manufacturer will provide warranty credit for up to 35 work-hours for the inspection and modification work, as stated onpage 8 of EXTRA Service Bulletin No. 300-2-95, Issue: F, Dated: July 10, 2006.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, "General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will nothave federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include "Docket No.FAA-2006-26134; Directorate Identifier 2006-CE-56-AD'' in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2002-21-11, Amendment 39-12917 (67 FR 65479, October 25, 2002) and adding the following new AD: