This amendment adopts a new AD for Eurocopter Model SA-360C, SA-365C, SA-365C1, and SA-365C2 helicopters with an MGB base plate, part number (P/N) 360A32-2311-02 or P/N 360A32- 2311-03. This action requires visually inspecting the MGB for a crack in the MGB base plate, close to the attachment hole, using a 10x or higher magnifying glass. Stripping paint from the inspection area is also required, but only before the initial inspection. This amendment is prompted by the discovery of a crack in the MGB base plate of a MGB installed in a Eurocopter Model AS-365 N2 helicopter, which is of similar type design to the helicopter models affected by this AD. The cause of the crack is under investigation; therefore, this AD is an interim action until the cause of the crack can be determined. The crack was located very close to the attachment points of one of the laminated pads, and it propagated to the inside of the MGB base plate and then continued into the MGB casing.This condition, if not detected, could result in failure of one of the MGB attachment points to the frame, which could result in severe vibration and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. \n\n\tWe have previously issued AD 2004-16-15, Amendment 39-13771 (69 FR 51358), that applies to Eurocopter Model AS-365N2, AS 365 N3, EC 155B, EC155B1, SA-365N and N1, and SA-366G1 helicopters with an MGB base plate, P/N 366A32-1062-03 or P/N 366A32-1062-06. Since the issuance of that AD, the Direction G(eacute)n(eacute)rale de L'Aviation Civile (DGAC), the airworthiness authority for France, notified us that an unsafe condition may also exist on Eurocopter Model SA 360 C and SA 365 C, C1, C2, and C3 helicopters. The SA 365 C3 is not type certificated in the United States. The DGAC advises of the discovery of a crack on the MGB base plate of a Model AS 365 N2 helicopter. \n\n\tEurocopter has issued Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.25, dated February 17, 2005 (ASB), which specifies visually inspecting the MGB base plate for the absence of cracks. In addition, the ASB states that a 10x magnifying glass can be used to facilitate the crack inspection. If in doubt about the existence of a crack, the ASB specifies inspecting for a crack using a dye-penetrant crack detection inspection. The ASB also states that after the crack was discovered on the Eurocopter Model AS365 N2 helicopter, the Eurocopter Model SA360 C and SA365C, C1, C2, and C3 helicopters were excluded from monitoring requirements. However, after issuing an Alert Telex, further cases of cracks were reported on helicopters covered by the monitoring requirement. Also, since the issuance of their initial service information, additional investigations and examinations have shown that the helicopter versions initially excluded from the monitoring requirements are also concerned by the potential risk and their MGB bottom plate must also be monitored. The DGAC classified this ASB as mandatory and issued AD No. F-2005-036, dated March 2, 2005, to ensure the continued airworthiness of these helicopters in France. \n\n\tThese helicopter models are manufactured in France and are type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.29 and the applicable bilateral agreement. Pursuant to the applicable bilateral agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the United States. \n\n\tThis unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design. Therefore, this AD is being issued to detect a crack in the MGB base plate and prevent failure of a MGB attachment point to the frame, which could result in severe vibration and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. This AD requires initial and repetitive inspections of theMGB base plate for cracking at the following intervals: \n\n\nFor any MGB that: \nAccomplish the AD actions: \n\n\n(a) Has less than 26,900 cycles and has never been overhauled or repaired. \nOn or before accumulating 26,900 cycles and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 55 hours time-in-service (TIS). \n\n\n(b) Has 26,900 or more cycles and has never been overhauled or repaired. \nBefore further flight and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 55 hours TIS. \n\n\n(c) Is installed that has been overhauled or repaired .............................. \nBefore further flight and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 55 hours TIS. \n\nOne cycle equates to one helicopter landing in which a landing gear touches the ground. \n\n\tNone of the Eurocopter Model SA-360C, SA-365C, SA-365C1, and SA- 365C2 helicopters affected by this action are on the U.S. Register. All helicopters included in the applicability of this rule are currently operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry; therefore, they are not directly affected by this AD action. However, the FAA considers that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject helicopters are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future. \n\n\tShould an affected helicopter be imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future, it would take approximately 0.5 work hour for the initial inspection and 0.25 work hour for each recurring inspection. Replacing the MGB, if necessary, would take approximately 4 work hours to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. It would cost approximately $25,000 to repair a cracked MGB base plate. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would be $25,455, assuming that one helicopter is imported and inspected 11 times (the initial inspection plus 10 recurring inspections) and the MGB is replaced once. \n\n\tSince this AD action does not affect any helicopter that is currently on the U.S. register, it has no adverse economic impact and imposes no additional burden on any person. Therefore, notice and public procedures hereon are unnecessary and the amendment may be made effective in less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. \n\nComments Invited \n\n\tThis AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data, views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under ADDRESSES. Include "Docket No. FAA-200X-XXXXX; Directorate Identifier 2005-SW-15-AD" at the beginning of your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light of those comments. \n\n\tWe will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://dms.dot.gov , including anypersonal information you provide. We will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit http://dms.dot.gov . \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\tWe have determined that notice and prior public comment are unnecessary in promulgating this regulation; therefore, it can be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft since none of these model helicopters are registered in the United States. We have also determined that this regulation is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the AD docket. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, "General requirements." Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\nAccordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive to read as follows: