AD 2006-03-04

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain transport category airplanes, identified above. \n\n\tThis AD requires repetitive inspections for cracks of the doorjamb corners of the main cabin cargo door, and repair if necessary. This AD also provides an optional preventive modification that extends certain repetitive intervals. This AD results from reports of cracks in the fuselage skin at the corners of the doorjamb for the main cabin cargo door. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin, which could result in rapid decompression of the airplane.

Final rule.

2006-03-04 McDonnell Douglas: Amendment 39-14468. Docket No. FAA- 2005-22425; Directorate Identifier 2005-NM-066-AD. \n\nEffective Date \n\n\t(a) This AD becomes effective March 13, 2006. \n\nAffected ADs \n\n\t(b) None. \n\nApplicability \n\n\t(c) This AD applies to McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-33, DC-8-51, DC-8-53, DC-8-55, DC-8F-54, DC-8F-55, DC-8-63, DC-8-62F, DC-8-63F, DC-8-71, DC-8-73, DC-8-71F, DC-8-72F, and DC-8-73F airplanes, certificated in any category; as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin DC8-53-079, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2002. \n\nUnsafe Condition \n\n\t(d) This AD results from reports of cracks in the fuselage skin at the corners of the doorjamb for the main cabin cargo door. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracks in the fuselage skin, which could result in rapid decompression of the airplane. \n\nCompliance \n\n\t(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. \n\nInspections \n\n\t(f) At the applicable time in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD: Do the applicable inspections for cracking of the doorjamb corners of the main cabin cargo door in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC8-53-079, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2002; the applicable inspections are specified in Table 1 of Paragraph 1.E. "Compliance" of the service bulletin. Except as provided by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, repeat the inspections thereafter at intervals not to exceed the applicable intervals specified in Table 1 of Paragraph 1.E. "Compliance" of the service bulletin. \n\n\t(1) For airplanes that have been converted from passenger to cargo under Amended Type Certificate Data Sheet 4A25, Notes 25 and 26, and McDonnell Douglas Supplemental Type Certificates SA3749WE and SA3403WE: Within 15,000 flight cycles after the conversion; or within 12 months after the effective date of this AD; whichever occurs later. \n\n\t(2) For airplanes that have not been converted from passenger to cargo: Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 3,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later. \n\nCorrective Actions and New Repetitive Intervals \n\n\t(g) If any crack is found during any inspection required by this AD, before further flight: Do the applicable action in paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC8-53-079, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2002. \n\n\t(1) For any corner where all cracks are 2.50 inches or less in length, install an external doubler in accordance with the service bulletin: Before the accumulation of 17,000 flight cycles after the installation, do the next inspection of that corner as specified in paragraph (f) of this AD. Repeat the inspections in paragraph (f) of this AD for that corner thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,400 flight cycles. \n\n\t(2) For any corner where any crack is greater than 2.50 inches in length, repair the crack using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. \n\nOptional Preventive Modification \n\n\t(h) Installing an external doubler on a corner in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin DC8- 53-079, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2002, terminates the repetitive inspection intervals of paragraph (f) of this AD for that corner. Before the accumulation of 17,000 flight cycles after the installation: Do the next inspection of that corner, as specified in paragraph (f) of this AD. Repeat the inspections in paragraph (f) of this AD for that corner thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,400 flight cycles. \n\nNo Reporting Required \n\n\t(i) Although the service bulletin referenced in this AD specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include that requirement. \n\nActions Accomplished In Accordance With Previous Issue of Service Bulletin \n\n\t(j) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in accordance with McDonnell Douglas Service Bulletin C8-53-079, dated January 31, 2001, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding action in this AD. \n\nAlternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) \n\n\t(k)(1) The Manager, Los Angeles Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. \n\n\t(2) Before using any AMOC approved in accordance with Sec. 39.19 on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify the appropriate principal inspector in the FAA Flight Standards Certificate Holding District Office. \n\n\t(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized bythe Manager, Los Angeles ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. \n\n\t(4) Inspections required by this AD of specified areas of Principal Structural Element (PSE) 53.08.044 are acceptable for compliance with the applicable requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of AD 93-01-15, amendment 39-8469 (58 FR 5576, January 22, 1993). The remaining areas of the affected PSEs must be inspected and repaired as applicable, in accordance with AD 93-01-15. \n\nMaterial Incorporated by Reference \n\n\t(l) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin DC8-53-079, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2002, to perform the actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Long Beach Division, 3855 Lakewood Boulevard, Long Beach, California 90846, Attention: Data and Service Management, Dept. C1-L5A (D800-0024), for a copy of this service information. You may review copies at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC; on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov; or at the National Archives and Records \nAdministration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at the NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal--register/ code--of--federal--regulations/ibr--locations.html.

Examining the Docket \n\n\tYou may examine the airworthiness directive (AD) docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov or in person at the Docket Management Facility office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Management Facility office (telephone (800) 647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Nassif Building at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. \n\nDiscussion \n\n\tThe FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain McDonnell Douglas Model DC-8-33, DC-8-51, DC-8-53, DC-8-55, DC-8F-54, DC-8F-55, DC-8-63, DC-8-62F, DC-8-63F, DC-8-71, DC-8-73, DC-8-71F, DC-8-72F, and DC-8-73F airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 16, 2005 (70 FR 54674). That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections for cracks of the doorjamb corners of the main cabin cargo door, and repair if necessary. ThatNPRM also proposed an optional preventive modification that extends certain repetitive intervals. \n\nComments \n\n\tWe provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We have considered the comment received. \n\nRequest to Refer to Inspections in Service Bulletin \n\n\tThe commenter requests that we change paragraph (f) of the NPRM to refer to the inspections in Paragraph 1.E., Table 1, of Boeing Service Bulletin DC8-53-079, Revision 01, dated June 26, 2002, rather than using the current wording of paragraph (f). As proposed in the NPRM, paragraph (f) states: "Do detailed, high frequency eddy current, and radiographic inspections, as applicable * * * ," which the commenter states can be interpreted to require that all inspection types be accomplished for the main cabin cargo door jamb corners. The commenter states that referring to Paragraph 1.E., Table 1, would clarify the intent of the required inspection techniques. The commenter also notes that thischange would be consistent with the wording in two other ADs related to door jamb corners: AD 2000-20-08, amendment 39-11919, for passenger and service door jambs; and AD 2005-18-07, amendment 39- 14247, for the lower cargo door jamb. \n\n\tWe agree with the commenter. The requested change clarifies the intent of the inspection techniques, and is also consistent with the wording in similar ADs. We have revised paragraph (f) of the final rule to include this change. We have also deleted Note 1, which describes an inspection technique that is no longer mentioned in the AD. \n\nClarification of Paragraph (g)(2) \n\n\tWe have revised paragraph (g)(2) of this action to clarify that, for any corner where any crack is greater than 2.50 inches in length, the repair should be done using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (k), rather than just in accordance with paragraph (k). \n\nClarification of Alternative Method of Compliance (AMOC) Paragraph \n\n\tWe have revised this action to clarify the appropriate procedure for notifying the principal inspector before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies. \n\nConclusion \n\n\tWe have carefully reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. We have determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\tThere are about 225 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $65 per hour. \n\n\tEstimated Costs\n\n\n\nAction \nWork hours \nParts \nCost per airplane \nNumber of U.S.-registered airplanes \nFleet Cost \n\n\n\n\n\n\nInspection, per inspection cycle. \n20 \nNone \n$1,300, per inspection \ncycle. \n166 \n$215,800, perinspection cycle. \n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nOptional preventive modification (per corner). \n80 \n$26,881 to $30,913 \n(per corner, depending on airplane configuration). \n$32,081 to $36,113 \nUp to 166 \nUp to between \n$5,325,446 and \n$5,994,758 (for one \ncorner). \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, Section 44701, "General requirements." Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\tWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\n\t(1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; \n\n\t(2) Is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and \n\n\t(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\n\tWe prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\nAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):