The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with an AD for certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and - 900 series airplanes. That action, published in the Federal Register on September 7, 2004 (69 FR 54053), proposed to require repetitive detailed, low frequency eddy current, and high frequency eddy current inspections of the webs of the aft pressure bulkhead at body station 1016 for cracks, and corrective action if necessary. \n\nActions Since Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) Was Issued \n\n\tSince the NPRM was issued, Boeing has received a Delegation Option Authorization (DOA). We have revised this final rule to delegate the authority to approve an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) for any repair required by this AD to an Authorized Representative for the Boeing DOA Organization rather than a Designated Engineering Representative. \n\nComments \n\n\tWe provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We haveconsidered the comment that has been submitted on the proposed AD. \n\nRequest for Repair or Preventative Modification \n\n\tThe commenter, an operator, requests that the manufacturer add either repair instructions or a preventative modification and task hour estimate for the respective action to Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53- 1251, dated June 3, 2004. The commenter states that the service bulletin does not recommend any repair or terminating action if cracks are found during inspection of the aft pressure bulkhead, but instead specifies contacting the manufacturer if cracks are found. \n\n\tAlthough we agree with the intent of the commenter's request, we also know that variations in the type and degree of damage at and around the web lap splices at the dome apex of the aft pressure bulkhead make it difficult to develop general repair instructions, or a preventative modification, that could be applicable to and effective for all conditions. Furthermore, the manufacturer has experience repairing damage in the area of the web lap splices of the aft pressure bulkhead and can assist in developing repairs appropriate for specific conditions. For these reasons, we are allowing the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, or an Authorized Representative for the Boeing DOA Organization to approve repairs in accordance with paragraph (g) of this final rule. If general repair instructions or a preventative modification should be developed at a later time, and the service bulletin is revised to include either of these actions, we will consider approving the revised service bulletin as an AMOC to this final rule. Therefore, no change is necessary to this final rule in this regard. \n\nExplanation of Editorial Change \n\n\tFor clarification, we have replaced the word "listed" with "identified" to specify the applicability in paragraph (c) of this AD. \n\nConclusion \n\n\tWe have carefully reviewed the available data, including the comment that has been submitted, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. We have determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\tThis AD affects about 457 airplanes of U.S. registry and 1,166 airplanes worldwide. The actions will take about 8 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $237,640, or $520 per airplane, per inspection cycle. \n\nAuthority for this Rulemaking \n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, "General requirements." Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\tWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\n\t(1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; \n\n\t(2) Is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and \n\n\t(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\n\tWe prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\nAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):