AD 2004-25-02

Superseded

Cracking in certain areas of the fuselage

Key Information
2004-25-02
Superseded
February 10, 2005
December 29, 2004
FAA-2004-18773
39-13889
Applicability
["Aircraft"]
["Large Airplane"]
Airbus
A320-111 A320-211 A320-212 A320-231
Summary

The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD), which applies to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive inspections to detect fatigue cracking in certain areas of the fuselage, and corrective action if necessary. That AD also provides for an optional terminating action for the repetitive inspections. This new AD reduces the compliance threshold and repetitive intervals for the inspections required by the existing AD. This AD is prompted by a full-scale fatigue survey on the Model A320 fleet. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the fuselage, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. \n\nDATES: This AD becomes effective February 10, 2005. \n\n\tThe incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53- 1032, Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001, as listed in the AD, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of February 10, 2005. \n\n\tOn February 12, 1999 (64 FR 1114, January 8, 1999), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 01, dated January 15, 1998.

Action Required

Final rule.

Regulatory Text

2004-25-02 Airbus: Amendment 39-13889. Docket No. FAA-2004-18773; Directorate Identifier 2002-NM-312-AD. \n\nEffective Date \n\n\t(a) This AD becomes effective February 10, 2005. \n\nAffected ADs \n\n\t(b) This AD supersedes AD 99-01-19, amendment 39-10987. \n\nApplicability \n\n\t(c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A320-111, -211, -212, and - 231 series airplanes on which Airbus Modification 21346 has not been done, certificated in any category. \n\nUnsafe Condition \n\n\t(d) This AD was prompted by a full-scale fatigue survey on the Model A320 fleet. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the fuselage, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane. \n\nCompliance \n\n\t(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions have already been done. \n\nRepetitive Inspections \n\n\t(f) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD: Do a detailed inspection to find cracking on the outboard flanges around the fastener holes of frames 38 through 41, between stringers 12 and 21, using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53- 1032, Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001. Accomplishment of the inspection required by this paragraph ends the requirements of AD 99-01-19. \n\n\t(1) For airplanes on which the inspection specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 01, dated January 15, 1998; or Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001; has been done as of the effective date of this AD: Do the next inspection within 4,900 flight cycles after accomplishment of the last inspection, or within 1,100 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever is later. \n\n\t(2) For airplanes on which no inspection specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 01, dated January 15, 1998; or Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001; has been done as of the effective date of this AD: Do the inspection at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of this AD. \n\n\t(i) Before the accumulation of 30,000 total flight cycles. \n\n\t(ii) Before the accumulation of 24,800 total flight cycles, or within 3,500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever is later. \n\n\t(g) If no crack is found during the inspection required by paragraph (f)(1) or (f)(2) of this AD: Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 4,900 flight cycles. \n\n\tNote 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is defined as: "An intensive visual examination of a specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be required." \n\nCorrective Action \n\n\t(h) If any crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD, before further flight, repair using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 01, dated January 15, 1998; or Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001. Accomplishment of a repair using the service bulletin ends the repetitive inspection requirements for the area repaired. If any crack is found during any inspection required by this AD, and the service bulletin specifies to contact Airbus for appropriate action: Before further flight, repair using a method approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. \n\nOptional Terminating Action \n\n\t(i) Accomplishment of Airbus Modification 21346 using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1031, dated December 9, 1994; or Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001; constitutes terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements of this AD. \n\n\t(j) Accomplishment of the optional terminating action specified in AD 99-01-19 before the effective date of this AD, using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1031, dated December 9, 1994; or Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001; is considered acceptable for compliance with paragraph (i) of this AD. \n\nAlternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) \n\n\t(k) The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. \n\nRelated Information \n\n\t(l) French airworthiness directive 2002-259(B), dated May 15, 2002, also addresses the subject of this AD. \n\nMaterial Incorporated by Reference \n\n\t(m) You must use Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 01, dated January 15, 1998; or Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001; to perform the actions that are required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. \n\n\t(1) The Director of the Federal Register approves the incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 02, dated December 5, 2001,in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. \n\n\t(2) On February 12, 1999 (64 FR 1114, January 8, 1999), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1032, Revision 01, dated January 15, 1998. \n\n\t(3) For copies of the service information, contact Airbus, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. For information on the availability of this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), call (202) 741-6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html. \n\n\tYou may view the AD docket at the Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400 Seventh Street SW., room PL-401, Nassif Building, Washington, DC.

Supplementary Information

The FAA proposed to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR Part 39) with an AD to supersede AD 99-01-19, amendment 39-10987 (64 FR 1114, January 8, 1999). The existing AD applies to certain Airbus Model A320 series airplanes. The proposed AD was published in the Federal Register on August 5, 2004 (69 FR 47391), to require reducing the compliance threshold and repetitive intervals for the inspections required by the existing AD. The proposed AD would also continue to provide for an optional terminating action for the repetitive inspections. \n\nComments \n\n\tWe provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We have considered the comment submitted on the proposed AD. The commenter supports the proposed AD. \n\nClarification of Certain Wording in Preamble of Proposed AD \n\n\tFor clarification, we are explaining an inadvertent error in certain wording in the preamble of the proposed AD, which differed from the AD requirements for the optional terminating action specified in paragraph (i) of the proposed AD. In the Summary, Relevant Service Information, and FAA's Determination and Requirements of the proposed AD sections, we specify that the proposed AD would reduce the allowable time for the optional terminating action (provided by the existing AD). However, in paragraph (i) of the proposed AD we did not include that "allowable time" for accomplishing the optional terminating action. This decision was based on the fact that the French airworthiness directive referenced in the proposed AD did not specify an allowable time for the optional terminating action, and although the existing AD did contain an allowable time, it was not necessary to restate that time in the proposed AD. In light of the above, we have removed the wording "* * * would reduce the allowable time for the optional terminating action * * *" from the new actions in the Summary section. The Relevant Service Information and FAA's Determination and Requirements of the proposed AD sections are not restated in the final rule. \n\nClarification of Paragraph (f)(2) of Proposed AD \n\n\tFor clarification, we are explaining an inadvertent error in paragraph (f)(2) of the proposed AD. Paragraph (f)(2) of the proposed AD specified doing the inspection at the earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of the AD; the correct citation is paragraphs (f)(2)(i) and (f)(2)(ii) of the AD. \n\nConclusion \n\n\tWe have carefully reviewed the available data, including the comment that has been submitted, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. We have determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\tThis AD affects about 269 airplanes of U.S. registry. \n\n\tThe inspection that is required by AD 99-01-19 and retained in thisAD takes about 19 work hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the currently required inspection is $1,235 per airplane. \n\n\tThe optional terminating action specified in Airbus Service Bulletin A320-53-1031, if done, takes about 1 work hour per fastener hole, at an average labor rate of $65 per work hour. The cost of required parts is about $4,219 (for one modification kit). Based on these figures, the cost of the optional terminating action would be a minimum of $4,284 per airplane. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\tThe FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority. \n\n\tThis rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, "General requirements." Under that section, the FAA is charged with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\tWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\n\t(1) Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; \n\n\t(2) Is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR11034, February 26, 1979); and \n\n\t(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\n\tWe prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\nAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\n§ 39.13 (Amended) \n\n2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

AD Assistant

Get AI-powered answers about this AD, check applicability, and find compliance steps.

Sign Up to Unlock
Related ADs
2020-22-06 Replaced by the above
Contact Information

Technical information: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2125; fax (425) 227-1149. \n\n\tPlain language information: Marcia Walters, marcia.walters@faa.gov.

References
(Federal Register: January 6, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 4))
--- - Part 39
(Page 1184-1186)
FAA Documents