Discussion
What events have caused this AD? The FAA has received several reports of cracks and corrosion on part number (P/N) 0322709 and P/N 0322709-1 inboard aileron hinge brackets on Cessna Models 190, 195 (L-126A,B,C), 195A, and 195B airplanes. These inboard aileron hinge brackets are constructed of magnesium, which is highly susceptible to corrosion.
When corrosion starts to develop, the inboard aileron hinge brackets could crack across the bearing boss.
What is the potential impact if FAA took no action? Cracked or corroded inboard aileron hinge brackets, if not detected and corrected, could result in the ailerons separating from the airplane with consequent reduced or loss of control of the airplane.
Has FAA taken any action to this point? We issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to all Cessna Models 190, 195 (L-126A,B,C), 195A, and 195B airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on July 15, 2004 (69 FR 42358). The NPRM proposed to require you to repetitively inspect the affected inboard aileron hinge brackets for cracks or corrosion and replace them if found cracked or corroded. Replacement with aluminum brackets would terminate the need for the repetitive inspections.
Accomplishment of the proposed inspections would be following Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SEB04-1, dated April 26, 2004.
Comments
Was the public invited to comment? We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal and FAA's response to each comment:
Comment Issue No. 1: Allow for Replacement of Inboard Aileron Hinge Brackets Other Than Cessna Inboard Aileron Hinge Brackets
What is the commenter's concern? Several commenters point out that the NPRM is confusing. They state that theNPRM preamble states that you must replace any inboard aileron hinge bracket made from magnesium with one made from aluminum. However, the actual AD portion of the NPRM refers to replacing with inboard aileron hinge brackets as specified in Cessna Single Engine Service Bulletin SEB04-1, dated April 26, 2004. The commenters believe that this could be confusing in the field as to whether you can install non-Cessna parts.
Some of these commenters wanted FAA to list the parts that were approved for installation, including Cessna parts, supplemental type certificate (STC) parts, and parts manufacturer approval (PMA) parts.
What is FAA's response to the concern? The FAA agrees that the NPRM is confusing. The intent was to allow installation of any FAA-approved inboard aileron hinge bracket that is made from aluminum as terminating action for the repetitive inspections. We will rewrite this portion of the AD to ensure that the intent is communicated correctly.
However, listingall approved replacement inboard aileron hinge brackets in the AD is a tedious task and one that could become burdensome if others wanted the list updated at a later time. Therefore, we are not including a list of FAA-approved replacement parts. We will include information that states that FAA-approved replacement parts may be Cessna parts, STC parts, or PMA parts, etc.
The final rule reflects the change in wording to ensure the understanding that you may install non-Cessna parts.
Comment Issue No. 2: Refer to the Model 195 Airplanes as Model 195 (L-126A,B,C) Airplanes
What is the commenter's concern? One commenter recommends that FAA change reference to the Model 195 airplanes in the applicability to Model 195 (L-126A,B,C) airplanes. This would coincide with Type Certificate Data Sheet A-790, Revision 36, dated March 31, 2003.
What is FAA's response to the concern? The FAA agrees and will change the final rule AD accordingly.
Conclusion
What is FAA's finaldetermination on this issue? We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for the changes discussed above and minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these changes and minor corrections:
--Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
--Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.
Docket Information
Where can I go to view the docket information? You may view the AD docket that contains information relating to this subject in person at the DMS Docket Offices between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. (eastern standard time), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-647-5227) is located on the plaza level of the Department of Transportation NASSIF Building at the street address stated in ADDRESSES. You may also view the AD docket on the Internet at http://dms.dot.gov.
Changes to 14 CFR Part 39--Effect on the AD
How does the revision to 14 CFR part 39 affect this AD? On July 10, 2002, the FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA's AD system. This regulation now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight permits, and alternative methods of compliance. This material previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD actions.
Costs of Compliance
How many airplanes does this AD impact? We estimate that this AD affects 1,180 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What is the cost impact of this AD on owners/operators of the affected airplanes? We estimate the following costs to do this proposed inspection:
Labor cost
Parts cost
Total cost per airplane
Total cost on U.S. operators
1 workhour x $65 per hour = $65
No special parts necessaryfor inspection.
$65
1,180 airplanes x $65 = $76,700.
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary replacements that would be required based on the results of this proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of airplanes that may need this replacement:
Labor cost
Parts cost
Total cost per airplane
6 workhours x $65 per hour = $390
$2,954
$3,344
Regulatory Findings
Will this AD impact various entities? We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
Will this AD involve a significant rule or regulatory action? For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
1. Is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a "significant rule" under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include "Docket No. FAA-2004-18033; Directorate Identifier 2004-CE-16-AD" in your request.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39-AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows: