Discussion
Has FAA Taken Any Action to This Point?
The Civil Aviation Authority for the Czech Republic (CAA CZ) reported to FAA that Moravan Model Z-242L airplanes are operated over the load spectrum that was used at certification and are in need of a technical service life. This caused FAA to issue AD 2003-03-13, Amendment 39-13037 68 FR 4905, January 31, 2003). AD 2003-03-13 establishes a technical service life for these airplanes by restricting Acrobatic and Utility category operations and requiring replacement of the wings after a certain operational time period. The technical service life required by AD 2003-03-13 is as follows:
Acrobatic and utility category operations
All operations
Group 1
190 hours time-in-service (TIS) only in these categories. Operation only in the Normal category thereafter.
3,500 hours TIS. New wings must be installed prior to further operation.
Group 2
450 hours TIS only in these categories. Operation only in the Normal category thereafter.
5,500 hours TIS. New wings must be installed prior to further operation.
Accomplishment of AD 2003-03-13 is required in accordance with the following:
--Mandatory Service Bulletin Z 242L/27a--Rev. 1, dated October 31, 2000: This service bulletin includes procedures for installing strengthened wings on airplanes with a serial number in the range of 0001 through 0656; and
--Mandatory Service Bulletin Z 242L/37a (Z 142C/17a), Rev. 1, and Mandatory Service Bulletin Z 242L/38a (Z 142C/18a), both dated October 31, 2000: These service bulletins include criteria for a new technical service life of the affected airplanes and specify operational limitations for Acrobatic and Utility category operations.
What Has Happened Since AD 2003-03-13 To Initiate This Action?
The Civil Aviation Authority Czech Republic (CAA CZ), which is the airworthiness authority for the Czech Republic, notified FAA of the need to change AD 2003-03-13. The CAA reports that the restriction and replacement actions of AD 2003-03-13 do not completely address the unsafe condition.
The restrictions only take account for the aerobatic load spectrum and do not account for the aerobatic frequency. Although the aerobatic frequency will extend the operational times, it more importantly will ensure that all airplanes (even those that have not reached the operational limits) are not subject to fatigue cracking caused by exceeding the aerobatic frequency.
The restrictions also address the life limit of the wings when they should address the life limit of the entire airframe (life limit of the airplane). The CAA CZ reports that the AD change is necessary to:
--Address the aerobatic frequency so affected airplanes that are operated in accordance with the current restrictions do not continue to be subject to the unsafe condition because the aerobatic frequency was not accounted for;
--Life limit the entire airplane instead of just the wings; and
--Prevent structural failure of the wing due to fatigue cracking. Such failure could result in a wing separating from the airplane with consequent loss of airplane control.
Why Should the Affected Airplanes Be Life Limited?
The airframe of the Moravan Model Z-242L airplanes has always been life limited. The problem is that there have been numerous changes to the Airworthiness Limitations section of the maintenance manual, which has caused confusion as to what the actual life limits are. These life limits vary between 3,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) and 5,500 hours TIS, and the affected airplanes incorporate both unstrengthened wings and strengthened wings.
In addition, the CAA CZ has accomplished fatigue testing on both the unstrengthened wings and strengthened wings using the FAA-approved load spectrum and aerobatic frequency. This testing shows that:
--The 3,500-hour TIS total airframe life limit and 190-hour TIS acrobatic and utility category restriction is necessary for airplanes with the unstrengthened wings; and
--The airplanes with strengthened wings are safe to fly up to 5,500 hours TIS total time.
The CAA CZ is continuing to test and analyze the strengthened wings. This testing and analysis could show that, with certain modifications or additional equipment, the airplanes could be operated past 5,500 hours TIS. As the CAA CZ shares this information, FAA may initiate additional rulemaking to address this matter. We will also consider alternative methods of compliance submitted in accordance with the procedures specified in the AD on a case-by-case basis.
Is There Service Information That Applies to This Subject?
Moravan has issued the following revised service information:
--Mandatory Service Bulletin Z 242L/38a--Rev. 1, dated April 15, 2003; and
--Mandatory Service Bulletin Z 242L/27a--Rev. 2, dated April 15, 2003;
The service bulletin revisions incorporate updated information and specify which AFM and maintenance manual revisions apply to individual airplanes.
What Action Did the CAA CZ Take?
The CAA CZ classified these service bulletins as mandatory and issued CAA-AD-T-100/2000R1, dated April 28, 2003, in order to ensure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in the Czech Republic.
Was This in Accordance With the Bilateral Airworthiness Agreement?
This airplane model is manufactured in Czech Republic and is type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement.
Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the CAA CZ has kept us informed of the situation described above.
The FAA's Determination and an Explanation of the Provisions of This AD
What Has FAA Decided?
The FAA has examined the findings of Czech Republic; reviewed all available information, including the service information referenced above; and determined that:
--The unsafe condition referenced in this document exists or could develop on type design Moravan Model Z 242L airplanes that are registered for operation in the United States;
--The actions specified in the previously-referenced service information (as specified in this AD) should be accomplished on the affected airplanes; and
--AD action should be taken in order to correct this unsafe condition.
What Does This AD Require?
This action supersedes AD 2003-03-13 with a new AD that requires an adjustment to the operational limitations based on the aerobatic frequency and changes the life limit to the entire airplane instead of just the wings. The operational limitations adjustment consists of incorporating information into the Limitations Section of the Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) and the Airworthiness Limitations section of the maintenance manual.
In preparation of this rule, we contacted Moravan America, type clubs, and aircraft operators to obtain technical information and information on operational and economic impacts. We have included, in the rulemaking docket, a discussion of information that may have influenced this action. This includes notes from the meeting between FAA and Moravan America.
How Does the Revision to 14 CFR Part 39 Affect This AD?
On July 10, 2002, FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which governs FAA's AD system. This regulation now includes material that relates to special flight permits, alternative methods of compliance, and altered products. This material previously was included in each individual AD. Since this material is included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD actions.
Will I Have the Opportunity To Comment Prior to the Issuance of the Rule?
Because the unsafe condition described in this document could result in a wing separating from the airplane with consequent loss of control of the airplane,we find that notice and opportunity for public prior comment are impracticable. Therefore, good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.
Comments Invited
How Do I Comment on This AD?
Although this action is in the form of a final rule and was not preceded by notice and opportunity for public comment, FAA invites your comments on the rule. You may submit whatever written data, views, or arguments you choose. You need to include the rule's docket number and submit your comments to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. We will consider all comments received on or before the closing date specified above. We may amend this rule in light of comments received. Factual information that supports your ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of this AD action and determining whether we need to take additional rulemaking action.
Are There Any Specific Portions of This AD I Should Pay Attention to?We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. You may view all comments we receive before and after the closing date of the rule in the Rules Docket. We will file a report in the Rules Docket that summarizes each FAA contact with the public that concerns the substantive parts of this AD.
How Can I Be Sure FAA Receives My Comment?
If you want us to acknowledge the receipt of your comments, you must include a self-addressed, stamped postcard. On the postcard, write "Comments to Docket No. 2003-CE-24-AD." We will date stamp and mail the postcard back to you.
Regulatory Impact
Does This AD Impact Various Entities?
These regulations will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, FAA has determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does This AD Involve a Significant Rule or Regulatory Action?
We have determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket (otherwise, an evaluation is not required). A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket. 4
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by Reference, Safety.Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
39.13 [Amended]
2. FAA amends 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2003-03-13, Amendment 39-13037 (68 FR 4905, January 31, 2003), and by adding a new AD to read as follows: