AD 2002-22-07

Superseded

Inboard main flap

Key Information
2002-22-07
Superseded
November 14, 2002
October 24, 2002
2002-NM-250-AD
39-12932
Applicability
["Aircraft"]
["Large Airplane"]
The Boeing Company
767 Series (all)
Summary

This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, that currently requires a one-time inspection for missing bolts on the inboard and outboard support of the inboard main flap, and follow-on inspections and corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment adds an inspection that was inadvertently omitted from the existing AD. The actions specified in this AD are intended to detect missing, loose, or cracked bolts on the supports of the inboard main flap and prevent loss of the inboard main flap, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition. \n\nDATES: Effective November 14, 2002.\n\n\tThe incorporation by reference, as listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 27, 2002 (67 FR 52401, August 12, 2002).\n\n\tComments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on orbefore December 30, 2002.

Action Required

Final rule; request for comments.

Regulatory Text

2002-22-07 Boeing: Amendment 39-12932. Docket 2002-NM-250-AD. Supersedes AD 2002-16-05, amendment 39-2844. \n\n\tApplicability: Model 767 series airplanes, including Model 767- 400ER series airplanes, line numbers 1 through 879 inclusive, certificated in any category. \n\n\tNote 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (g)(1) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. \n\n\tCompliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. \n\n\tTo detect missing, loose, or cracked bolts on the inboard and outboard support of the inboard main flap and prevent loss of the inboard main flap, which could result in loss of control of the airplane, accomplish the following: \n\nRestatement of Requirements of AD 2002-16-05 \n\nGroup 1 and 2 Airplanes: One-Time Inspection for Missing or Loose Bolts \n\n\t(a) Within 90 days after August 27, 2002 (the effective date of AD 2002-16-05, amendment 39-12844), do a one-time general visual inspection to determine if any bolt is missing from the outboard support of the inboard main flap, per Part 2 or Part 8, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-27A0176, Revision 1, dated June 6, 2002. Group 1 airplanes may comply with the replacement specified in paragraph (c) of this AD in lieu of the inspection in this paragraph, provided that the replacement per paragraph (c) of this AD is accomplished within the compliance time specified in this paragraph. \n\n\tNote 2: For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is defined as: "A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to enhance visual access to all exposed surfaces in the inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked." \n\n\t(1) If no bolt is missing, before further flight, do a general visual inspection for a gap between the nut and surrounding structure or between shim and joint (which would indicate a loose bolt), per Part 2 orPart 8, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin. If no bolt is missing and no gap is found, no further action is required by this paragraph. \n\n\t(2) If any bolt is missing, before further flight, do paragraph (b) of this AD. In lieu of paragraph (b) of this AD, airplanes in Group 1 may comply with paragraph (c) of this AD. \n\nGroup 1 and 2 Airplanes: Missing Bolts or Gaps--Follow-On Actions \n\n\t(b) For Group 1 or 2 airplanes as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-27A0176, Revision 1, dated June 6, 2002: If any bolt is missing or any gap is found during the inspections per paragraph (a) of this AD, before further flight, remove all of the bolts in the subject area and replace them with new or serviceable bolts, per Figure 6, 7, or 8 of the service bulletin, as applicable. For any attachment hole where the bolt was missing, install a new or serviceable bolt made from the same material as the other bolts, per the Accomplishment Instructions ofthe service bulletin. \n\n\t(1) An existing bolt may be reinstalled if a fluorescent dye penetrant inspection for cracking is done per Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin, and the bolt is found to be free of any crack. \n\n\t(2) Do not intermix BACB30MR*K* bolts with BACB30LE*K* or BACB30US*K* bolts in the joints subject to this AD. \n\nGroup 1 Airplanes: Optional Action \n\n\t(c) For Group 1 airplanes as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-27A0176, Revision 1, dated June 6, 2002: Replacement of all subject titanium bolts with new steel bolts per Part 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions of the service bulletin is acceptable for compliance with paragraphs (a) and (f) of this AD and eliminates the need for the inspections required by those paragraphs. Do not intermix BACB30MR*K* bolts with BACB30LE*K* or BACB30US*K* bolts in the joints subject to this AD. \n\nModel 767-400ER Series Airplanes: Initial Inspection and Corrective Actions \n\n\t(d) For Model 767-400ER series airplanes: Within 90 days after August 27, 2002, do a one-time general visual inspection to determine if any bolt is missing from the inboard and outboard support of the inboard main flap, and do a detailed inspection for a gap between the nut and surrounding structure or between shim and joint (which would indicate a loose bolt), per Figure 2 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-27A0176, Revision 1, dated June 6, 2002. \n\n\t(1) If no bolt is missing and no gap is found: No further action is required by this paragraph. \n\n\t(2) If any bolt bolt is missing or any gap is found: Do paragraphs (d)(2)(i) and (d)(2)(ii) of this AD. \n\n\t(i) Before further flight, repair per a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA; or per data meeting the type certification basis of the airplane approved by a Boeing Company Designated Engineering Representative who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make such findings. For a repairmethod to be approved as required by this paragraph, the approval must specifically refer to this AD. \n\n\t(ii) Within 10 days after the inspections: Submit a report of inspection findings to the Manager, Boeing Certificate Management Office, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 2500 East Valley Road, Suite C2, Renton, Washington 98055; fax (425) 227-1159. The report must include the airplane's serial number, the total number of flight cycles and flight hours on the airplane, the number and specific location of discrepant bolts, and the nature of the discrepancy (i.e., missing bolt or gap found). Information collection requirements contained in this AD have been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and have been assigned OMB Control Number 2120-0056. \n\nPreviously Accomplished Inspections and Bolt Replacements \n\n\t(e) Inspections and bolt replacements accomplished before the effective date of this AD per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767- 27A0176, dated November 16, 2001, are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions required by this AD. \n\nNew Requirements of This AD \n\nGroup 1 and 2 Airplanes: One-Time Inspection for Missing or Loose Bolts \n\n\t(f) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD: Do the one-time general visual inspection required by paragraph (a) of this AD to determine if any bolt is missing from the inboard support of the inboard main flap, per Part 2 or Part 8, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767- 27A0176, Revision 1, dated June 6, 2002. Group 1 airplanes may comply with the replacement specified in paragraph (c) of this AD in lieu of the inspection in this paragraph, provided that the replacement per paragraph (c) of this AD is accomplished within the compliance time specified in this paragraph. \n\nAlternative Methods of Compliance \n\n\t(g)(1) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Seattle ACO. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO. \n\n\t(2) Alternative methods of compliance, approved previously in accordance with AD 2002-16-05, amendment 39-12844, are approved as alternative methods of compliance with paragraph (d)(2)(i) of this AD. \n\n\tNote 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Seattle ACO. \n\nSpecial Flight Permits \n\n\t(h) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. \n\nIncorporation by Reference \n\n\t(i) Unless otherwise provided in this AD, the actions shall be done per Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767-27A0176, Revision 1, dated June 6, 2002. This incorporation by reference was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 27, 2002 (67 FR 52401, August 12, 2002). Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. \n\nEffective Date \n\n\t(j) This amendment becomes effective on November 14, 2002.

Supplementary Information

On August 1, 2002, the FAA issued AD 2002- 16-05, amendment 39-12844 (67 FR 52401, August 12, 2002), applicable to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes, to require a one-time inspection for missing bolts on the inboard and outboard support of the inboard main flap, and follow-on inspections and corrective actions, if necessary. That action was prompted by a report indicating that an operator found one missing bolt and two loose bolts out of four bolts at the aft attachment locations on the outboard support of the inboard main flap. The actions required by that AD are necessary to detect missing, loose, or cracked bolts on the supports of the inboard main flap and prevent loss of the inboard main flap, which could result in loss of control of the airplane. \n\nActions Since Issuance of Previous Rule \n\n\tSince the issuance of AD 2002-16-05, we have found that, for certain airplanes, the one-time inspection to determine if any bolt is missing from the inboard support of the inboard main flap, as specified in the referenced service bulletin, was inadvertently omitted from the current requirements of the AD. That inspection was identified in the preamble of the existing AD. \n\nExplanation of Requirements of Rule \n\n\tSince an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes of this same type design, this AD supersedes AD 2002-16-05 to continue to require a one-time inspection for missing bolts on the outboard support of the inboard main flap, and follow-on inspections and corrective actions, if necessary. This AD also adds a one-time inspection for missing bolts on the inboard support of the inboard main flap. \n\nInterim Action \n\n\tThis is considered to be interim action. We are currently considering requiring the repetitive inspections for gaps, the torque check for loose bolts, and the replacement of existing titanium bolts with steel bolts described in the referenced service bulletin. However, the compliance time for these actions would be sufficiently long so that notice and opportunity for prior public comment will be practicable. \n\nDetermination of Rule's Effective Date \n\n\tSince a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. \n\nComments Invited \n\n\tAlthough this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All communications received on or beforethe closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed. \n\n\tSubmit comments using the following format: \n\nOrganize comments issue-by-issue. For example, discuss a request to change the compliance time and a request to change the service bulletin reference as two separate issues. \n\nFor each issue, state what specific change to the AD is being requested. \n\nInclude justification (e.g., reasons or data) for each request. \n\n\tComments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination byinterested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket. \n\n\tCommenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: "Comments to Docket Number 2002-NM-250-AD." The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter. \n\nRegulatory Impact \n\n\tThe regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. \n\n\tThe FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and that it is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. \n\nAdoption of the Amendment \n\n\tAccordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n\t1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\n§ 39.13 (Amended) \n\n\t2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-12844 (67 FR 52401, August 12, 2002), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), amendment 39-12932, to read as follows:

AD Assistant

Get AI-powered answers about this AD, check applicability, and find compliance steps.

Sign Up to Unlock
Related ADs
2002-16-05 This AD replaces the above
2003-11-16 Replaced by the above
Contact Information

Suzanne Masterson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2772; fax (425) 227-1181.

References
(Federal Register: October 30, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 210))
--- - Part 39
(Page 66043-66045)
FAA Documents
ADs Superseded by This AD
AD Number Subject Effective Date Actions
2002-16-05 Inboard main flap 2002-08-27 View