Background \n\n\n\tThe FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all GE GE90-110B1 and GE90-115B model turbofan engines. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May 7, 2021 (86 FR 24554). The NPRM was prompted by an in- service occurrence of loss of engine thrust control resulting in uncommanded high thrust. The FAA received a report from the manufacturer of an in-service loss of engine thrust control that occurred on October 27, 2019, resulting in uncommanded high thrust. Analysis by the manufacturer found accumulated thermal cycles of the MN4 integrated circuit in the FADEC, through normal operation, causes the solder ball joints to wear out and eventually fail over time. The FAA published AD 2020-20-17 (85 FR 63443, dated October 8, 2020) to prohibit dispatch of an airplane if certain status messages are displayed on the engine indicating and crew alerting system and if certain conditions are present per the manufacturer's service information. As a terminating action, AD 2020-20-17 also requires revision of the existing FAA-approved minimum equipment list (MEL) by incorporating into the MEL the dispatch restrictions listed in AD 2020- 20-17. Since the effective date of AD 2020-20-17, the manufacturer published GE GE90-100 Service Bulletin (SB) 73-0118 R00, dated November 6, 2020, and Revision 01, dated April 27, 2021, to replace the FADEC MN4 microprocessor and solder. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require initial and repetitive replacement of the FADEC MN4 microprocessor using an approved overhaul procedure. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. \n\nDiscussion of Final Airworthiness Directive \n\nComments \n\n\n\tThe FAA received comments from five commenters. Commenters included Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), Boeing Commercial Airplanes (Boeing), Cathay Pacific Airways Limited (Cathay), FedEx Express (FedEx), and United Airlines, Inc. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. \n\nRequest To Revise Installation Prohibition \n\n\n\tCathay requested the FAA revise paragraph (h), Installation Prohibition, of the NPRM that specifies no more than three replacements of the FADEC MN4 microprocessor may be performed on the same main channel board. Cathay suggested that the FAA revise proposed paragraph (h) to prohibit installation onto any engine of any FADEC that is not compliant with GE GE90-100 SB 73-0118. Cathay stated that the MN4 processor replacements are managed by the original equipment manufacturer's (OEM) internal maintenance procedures and operators do not have visibility into the number of replacements that have been performed. \n\tThe FAA partially agrees. As stated by Cathay, the MN4 processor replacements are managed by the OEM's internal maintenance procedures and, therefore, are not necessary in this AD. The FAA has removed paragraph (h), Installation Prohibition, from this AD. The subsequent paragraphs of this AD have been redesignated accordingly. \n\nRequest To Add Terminating Action \n\n\n\tFedEx requested the upcoming FADEC software revision (A085) be included in this AD as a terminating action. FedEx commented that this AD may no longer be necessary due to the development and pending release of GE's new and improved FADEC software upgrade (A085). \n\tThe FAA disagrees. The new FADEC software revision (A085) has not been approved by the FAA. Therefore, this software is not eligible for installation and cannot be referenced in this AD. The FAA considers this AD to be an interim action. If terminating action is identified later, the FAA might consider additional rulemaking. The FAA did not change this AD. \n\n((Page 43410)) \n\nSupport for the AD \n\n\n\tALPA and Boeing expressed support for the NPRM as written. United Airlines, Inc. stated they had no objections to the NPRM as proposed. \n\nConclusion \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. Except for minor editorial changes, and any other changes described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator. \n\nRelated Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51 \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed General Electric GE90-100 Service Bulletin (SB) 73-0118, Revision 01, dated April 27, 2021. This SB specifies procedures for replacing the FADEC MN4 microprocessor. This service information is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES. \n\nInterim Action \n\n\n\tThe FAA considers this AD to be an interim action. If final action is later identified, the FAA may consider additional rulemaking. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tThe FAA estimates that this AD affects 311 engines installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. \n\tThe FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD: \n\n\n\tEstimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost per Cost on U.S. \n\tAction Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Remove and replace FADEC.............. 1 work-hour x $85 per $25,200 $25,285 $7,863,635 \n\thour = $85. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\tThe FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate. According to the manufacturer, however, some of the costs of this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tThe FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tThis AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, \n\t(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and \n\t(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.