Comments Invited \n\n\n\tThis AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety, and the FAA did not provide you with notice and an opportunity to provide your comments prior to it becoming effective. However, the FAA invites you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the AD, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters should send only one copy of written comments, or if comments are filed electronically, commenters should submit them only one time. Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR 11.35, the FAA will file in the docket all comments received, as well as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel concerning this rulemaking during the comment period. The FAA will consider all the comments received and may conduct additional rulemaking based on those comments. \n\nConfidential Business Information \n\n\n\tConfidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to this final rule contain commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to this final rule, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ''PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this final rule. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Matt Fuller, AD Program Manager, Continued Operational Safety Branch, Airworthiness Products Section, General Aviation and Rotorcraft Unit, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817-222-5110; email Matthew.Fuller@faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking. \n\nDiscussion \n\n\n\tThe FAA issued AD 2014-12-07 (79 FR 35035, June 19, 2014) (''2014- 12-07''), for Agusta Model AB412 and AB412EP helicopters with a pinion part number (P/N) 412-040-301-101 installed. AD 2014-12-07 requires within 100 hours time-in-service (TIS), magnetic particle inspecting each pinion for a crack and replacing the pinion if there is a crack. AD 2014-12-07 was prompted by EASA AD No. 2013-0187, dated August 16, 2013 (EASA AD 2013-0187), issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union. EASA advised of a report of a cracked pinion installed in the rotor brake quill that was discovered during a magnetic particle inspection (MPI). EASA further stated the crack was caused by residual stress generated during the manufacturing process. According to EASA, if not corrected, this condition could result in failure of the pinion with detachment of parts inside the transmission that could cause its malfunction or jamming, ultimately resulting in loss of control of the helicopter. To correct this unsafe condition, EASA AD 2013-0187 required an MPI of the pinion, and if there is a crack, replacing the pinion. \n\nActions Since AD 2014-12-07 Was Issued \n\n\n\tSince the FAA issued AD 2014-12-07, EASA issued AD No. 2016-0244, dated December 14, 2016 (EASA AD 2016-0244), which supersedes EASA AD 2013-0187. EASA advises of another cracked pinion due to a defect generated during the manufacturing process. Accordingly, EASA AD 2016- 0244 retains the MPI requirements of EASA AD 2013-0187 and requires inspecting the helicopter within three months to determine if certain serial-numbered pinions from the defective manufacturing batch are installed and removing any affected pinions before further flight. \n\tAlso, since the FAA issued AD 2014-12-07, Agusta changed its name to Leonardo S.p.a. This AD reflects that change and updates the contact information to obtain service documentation. \n\nFAA's Determination \n\n\n\tThese helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA about the unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is issuing this AD after evaluating all known \n\n((Page 55173)) \n\nrelevant information and determining that an unsafe condition is likely to exist or develop on other helicopters of the same type design. \n\nRelated Service Information \n\n\n\tThe FAA reviewed Leonardo Helicopters Bollettino Tecnico (BT) No. 412-147, dated September 12, 2016, which specifies identifying the serial numbers of the pinion, P/N 412-040-301-101, and removing certain pinions from service. \n\tThe FAA also reviewed AgustaWestland BT No. 412-135, Revision A, dated July 29, 2013, which describes procedures for a one-time MPI of pinion P/N 412-040-301-101. \n\nAD Requirements \n\n\n\tThis AD requires, within 75 hours TIS, removing from service pinion P/N 412-040-301-101 having serial number (S/N) C17987, C17990, or C17991. This AD also requires, within 100 hours TIS, performing an MPI for a crack on each pinion P/N 412-040-301-101 if the rotor brake quill has never been overhauled. If there is a crack, this AD requires, before further flight, removing the pinion from service. Finally, this AD prohibits installing pinion P/N 412-040-301-101 having S/N C17987, C17990, or C17991 on any helicopter. \n\nDifferences Between This AD and the EASA AD \n\n\n\tThe EASA AD requires removing from service certain pinions within 3 months; this AD requires removing these pinions within 75 hours TIS. The EASAAD also requires the MPI to be performed within 100 flight hours or 5 months, whichever occurs first; this AD requires compliance within 100 hours TIS. The EASA AD only prohibits installing pinion P/N 412-040-301-101 having serial number S/N C17987 or C17991, whereas this AD prohibits installing pinion P/N 412-040-301-101 having S/N C17987, C17990, or C17991. \n\nRegulatory Flexibility Act \n\n\n\tThe requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined that it has good cause to adopt this rule without notice and comment, RFA analysis is not required. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tThere are no costs of compliance with this AD because there are no helicopters with this type certificate on the U.S. Registry. \n\nFAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date \n\n\n\tSection 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ''good cause,'' finds that those procedures are ''impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good cause, may issue a final rule without seeking comment prior to the rulemaking. \n\tThere are no helicopters with this type certificate on the U.S. Registry. Therefore, the FAA finds good cause that notice and opportunity for prior public comment are unnecessary pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B). In addition, for the reasons stated above, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tThe FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements. Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action. \n\nRegulatory Findings \n\n\n\tThis AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t1. Isnot a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, and \n\t2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.