AD 2014-23-11

We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005-13-05, which applied to certain Boeing Model 747-400F series airplanes. AD 2005-13-05 required inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, and repair of any cracking. AD 2005-13-05 also required a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams, and repetitive inspections for cracking after accomplishing the modification. This new AD retains these actions and requires a second modification, repetitive inspections for cracking, and \n\n((Page 70442)) \n\nrepair if necessary. This AD was prompted by a determination that the upper chords of the upper deck floor beams at certain stations are structures that are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage, and that certain airplanes with an initial modification require a second modification for the airplane to meet its limit of validity (LOV). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain upper chords of the upper deck floor beam, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and rapid decompression or reduced controllability of the airplane.

Final rule.

Adoption of the Amendment \n\n\n\tAccordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows: \n\nPART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES \n\n0 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: \n\n\n\tAuthority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. \n\n\n\nSec. 39.13 (Amended) \n\n0 2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), and adding the following new AD: \n\n2014-23-11 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-18027 ; Docket No. FAA- 2014-0170; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-169-AD. \n\n(a) Effective Date \n\n\n\tThis AD is effective December 31, 2014. \n\n(b) Affected ADs \n\n\n\tThis AD replaces AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005). \n\n(c) Applicability \n\n\n\tThis AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. \n\n(d) Subject \n\n\n\tAir Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage. \n\n(e) Unsafe Condition \n\n\n\tThis AD was prompted by a report indicating that the upper chords of the upper deck floor beams at stations (STA) 340 through 520 have been determined to be structures that are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage, and airplanes that had an initial modification done before 15,000 total flight cycles require a second fastener hole zero-timing modification for the airplane to meet its limit of validity (LOV). We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain upper chords of the upper deck floor beam, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and rapid decompression or reduced controllability of the airplane. \n\n(f) Compliance \n\n\n\tComply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. \n\n(g) Retained Inspections With Revised Service Information \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information. Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flight cycles after July 27, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-13-05), whichever is later: Accomplish detailed and open-hole high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with Part 3.B.1. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\n(h) Retained Repair With Revised Service Information and Revised Repair Approval Language \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information and revised repair approval language. If any crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight, accomplish the actions required by paragraph (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD. \n\t(1) Repair in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013; except where these service bulletins specify to contact Boeing for appropriate action, before further flight, repair the cracking using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (o) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only \n\n((Page 70444)) \n\nBoeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\t(2) Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of the floor beams by doing all the actions in accordance with Part 3.B.2. or Part 3.B.3., as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 2 or Part 3, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\n(i) Retained Modification With Revised Service Information \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information. If no crack is found during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD: Accomplish the actions required by either paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, at the time specified. \n\t(1) Before further flight: Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of the floor beam by doing all the actions in accordance with Part 3.B.2 or Part 3.B.3., as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 2 or Part 3, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If the preventive modification is performed concurrently with the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD, the upper chord straps must be removed when performing the open-hole HFEC inspection. If any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\t(2) Before the accumulation of 20,000 total flight cycles, or within 1,000 flightcycles after July 27, 2005 (the effective date of AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), whichever is later: Accomplish the inspections and preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the actions in accordance with Part 3.B.2. or 3.B.3. as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 2 or Part 3, as applicable, of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\n(j) Retained Post-Modification Inspections With Revised Service Information \n\n\n\tThis paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), with revised service information. Within 15,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the applicable preventive modification required by paragraph (h)(2), (i)(1), or (i)(2) of this AD: Accomplish the applicable inspections required by either paragraph (j)(1) or (j)(2) of this AD; if any crack is found during any inspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, for airplanes on which the alternative preventive modification, as identified in the NOTE after step 3. of ''PART 2--INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,'' or as identified in the NOTE after step 4. of ''PART 3--INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, has been done, only the inspection specified by paragraph (j)(1) of this AD may be used. \n\t(1) Accomplish detailed and surface HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with Part 3.B.4. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no crack is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747- 53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\t(2) Accomplish detailed and open-hole HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and strap of the upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions in accordance with Part 3.B.5. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002; or Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no crack is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight cycles. As of the effective date of this AD, only Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, may be used. \n\n(k) New Floor Beam Hole Zero-Timing \n\n\n\tWithin 20,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the preventive modification of the Station 340 to Station 520 upper deck floor beams specified in paragraph (h)(2), (i)(1), or (i)(2) of this AD, or within 1,000 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Accomplish the floor beam hole zero-timing, in accordance with Part 6 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. \n\n(l) New Post-Modification Floor Beam Hole Zero-Timing Inspections \n\n\n\tWithin 15,000 flight cycles after accomplishing the floor beam hole zero-timing required by paragraph (k) of this AD: Accomplish the applicable inspections required by paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this AD; if any cracking is found during anyinspection, before further flight, repair as required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, for airplanes on which the alternative preventive modification, as identified in the NOTE after step 3. of ''PART 2--INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,'' or as identified in the NOTE after step 4. of ''PART 3--INSPECTION AND PREVENTIVE MODIFICATION,'' of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, has been done, only the inspection method specified by paragraph (l)(1) of this AD may be used. \n\t(1) Accomplish detailed and surface HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and straps of the Station 340 to Station 520 upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions, in accordance with Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no cracking is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 1,000flight cycles. \n\t(2) Accomplish detailed and open-hole HFEC inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and straps of the Station 340 to Station 520 upper deck floor beams, by doing all the applicable actions, in accordance with Part 5 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. If no cracking is found, repeat the inspections at intervals not to exceed 5,000 flight cycles. \n\n(m) Exception to Service Information \n\n\n\tWhere Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, specifies a compliance time ''after the revision date on this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD. \n\n(n) Credit for Previous Actions \n\n\n\tThis paragraph provides credit for the inspections, repairs, and modification required by paragraphs (g) through (j) of this AD, if the corresponding actions were performed before the effective dateof this AD using Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 1, dated June 25, 2009. \n\n(o) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) \n\n\n\t(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (p)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov. \n\t(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. \n\t(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by \n\n((Page 70445)) \n\nBoeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD. \n\t(4) AMOCs approved for AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding requirements of paragraphs (g) through (j) (the retained actions) of this AD. \n\n(p) Related Information \n\n\n\t(1) For more information about this AD, contact Nathan Weigand, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057- 3356; phone: 425-917-6428; fax: 425-917-6590; email: Nathan.P.Weigand@faa.gov. \n\t(2) Service information identified in this AD that is not incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in paragraphs(q)(5) and (q)(6) of this AD. \n\n(q) Material Incorporated by Reference \n\n\n\t(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. \n\t(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. \n\t(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on December 31, 2014. \n\t(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013. \n\t(ii) Reserved. \n\t(4) The following service information was approved for IBR on July 27, 2005 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005). \n\t(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, dated May 9, 2002. \n\t(ii) Reserved. \n\t(5) For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544- 5000, extension 1; fax 206-766-5680; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. \n\t(6) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. \n\t(7) You may view this service information that is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Discussion \n\n\n\tWe issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2005-13-05, Amendment 39-14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, 2005). AD 2005-13-05 applied to certain Boeing Model 747-400F series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 25, 2014 (79 FR 16241). The NPRM was prompted by a determination that the upper chords of the upper deck floor beams at certain stations are structures that are susceptible to widespread fatigue damage, and that certain airplanes with an initial modification require a second modification for the airplane to meet its LOV. The NPRM proposed to continue to require inspections for cracking of the web, upper chord, and upper chord strap of the upper deck floor beams, and repair of any cracking; a preventive modification of the upper deck floor beams; and repetitive inspections for cracking after accomplishing the modification. The NPRM proposed to also require a second modification, repetitive inspections for cracking, and repair if necessary. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking in certain upper chords of the upper deck floor beam, which could result in reduced structural integrity of the airplane and rapid decompression or reduced controllability of the airplane. \n\nComments \n\n\n\tWe gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. The following presents the comments received on the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014) and the FAA's response to each comment. \n\nRequest To Clarify Post-Modification Inspection Options \n\n\n\tBoeing requested that we revise paragraphs (j) and (l) of the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014) to clarify that the inspection options of paragraphs (j)(2) and (l)(2) are applicable only when the primary preventative modification option has been accomplished. Boeing stated that Boeing Service Bulletin 747-53A2443, Revision 2, dated August 2, 2013, added an alternative preventative modification option for which the inspection options of paragraphs (j)(2) and (l)(2) of this AD are not viable. \n\tWe agree with the commenter's request because these words add clarity as to which inspection option should be used. We have revised paragraphs (j) and (l) of this AD by stating that, as of the effective date of this AD, for airplanes on which the alternative preventive modification has been accomplished, only the inspection methods specified by paragraphs (j)(1) and (l)(1), respectively, of this AD may be used. \n\nConclusion \n\n\n\tWe reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes: \n\tAre consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition; and \n\tDo not add any additional burden upon the public than wasalready proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 16241, March 25, 2014). \n\tWe also determined that these changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD. \n\nCosts of Compliance \n\n\n\tWe estimate that this AD affects 13 airplanes of U.S. registry. \n\tWe estimate the following costs to comply with this AD: \n\n\n\tEstimated Costs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\tCost per Cost on U.S. \n\tAction Labor cost Parts cost product operators ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pre-modification inspections 11 work-hours x $0.................... $935 $12,155. \n\t(retained actions from AD $85 per hour = \n\t2005-13-05, Amendment 39- $935. \n\t14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, \n\t2005)). Modification/inspections done Up to 524work- Up to $14,874......... 59,414 $772,382. \n\tduring modification (retained hours x $85 per \n\tactions from AD 2005-13-05, hour = $44,540. \n\tAmendment 39-14141 (70 FR \n\t35989, June 22, 2005)). \n\n((Page 70443)) \n\n\n\nPost-modification inspections 66 work-hours x $0.................... 5,610 $72,930. \n\t(retained actions from AD $85 per hour = \n\t2005-13-05, Amendment 39- $5,610. \n\t14141 (70 FR 35989, June 22, \n\t2005)). Zero-Timing Procedure Option 1 71 work-hours x $0.................... 6,035 Up to $78,455. \n\t(including inspections) (new $85 per hour = \n\taction). $6,035. Zero-Timing Procedure Option 2 103 work-hours x $0.................... 8,755 Up to $113,815. \n\t(including inspections) (new $85 per hour = \n\taction). $8,755. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- \n\n\n\tWe have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this AD. \n\nAuthority for This Rulemaking \n\n\n\tTitle 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority. \n\tWe are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ''General requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.Regulatory Findings \n\n\n\tWe have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. \n\tFor the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD: \n\t(1) Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866, \n\t(2) Is not a ''significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), \n\t(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and \n\t(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. \n\nList of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 \n\n\n\tAir transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.